WeHo’s Budget Priorities, Based on the Numbers

ADVERTISEMENT

wehoville 201606 proposed budgetWest Hollywood’s budget for the coming year prioritizes new recreation and cultural facilities, streets/sidewalks, social services/transit, parking and public safety. That is according to an analysis by WeHo by the Numbers of the city’s proposed budget for fiscal year 2017. The fiscal year runs from July 1 to next June 30. The city council will consider the budget at Monday night’s meeting.

The proposed budget is $127 million or $3,540 per resident. It includes $114 million for operations and $13 million in capital projects. Capital projects involve buying, building or repairing major assets. For example, one capital project involves renovations at the newly purchased Coast Playhouse. The money already approved for Phase II of West Hollywood Park — including the new recreation center — is separate from these numbers.

weho by the numbers
David Warren

The proposed budget is 13% bigger than the prior year’s budget. The increase is driven by capital projects, which would grow 126%. That suggests that capital projects are a big part of West Hollywood’s budget priorities for the 2017 fiscal year. The proposed budget also shows a 7% increase in spending for operations. That includes 10% growth in contracted services and 6% more for wages and benefits.

WeHo by the Numbers used the proposed dollar increase in each city division’s budget as an indication of West Hollywood’s budget priorities. Each division is responsible for delivering particular city services, either to the public or to other divisions. The ten divisions with the biggest proposed dollar increases were Facilities and Field Services, City Engineering, Social Services (including all transit services), Parking, Revenue Management, Public Safety Administration, Police and Protective Services, Long Range and Mobility Planning, Arts and Economic Development and Special Events.

Facilities and Field Services would get almost $100 extra per resident to renovate the Coast Playhouse ($2.9 million) and another city building ($700,000).

The city engineer’s budget would increase $87 per resident. The city is proposing to buy all of the streetlights from their current owner, Southern California Edison ($2.6 million). The increase also would pay for new pedestrian-safety traffic signals on Santa Monica Boulevard ($850,000). A smaller amount would be used to hire another engineer.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Social Services division, which handles all of the city’s transit services, would get $58 more per resident. That would pay for new CityLine and Dial-a-Ride transit vehicles, the continuation of the CityLineX rush-hour express service to Hollywood and an additional social services administrator.

The Parking division would get the fourth biggest increase, mainly to pay for a new parking lot ($700,000) at the corner of Santa Monica and Crescent Heights.

Police and Protective Services has the largest proposed budget by far (not counting transfers among city funds). It would be about $525 per resident. But the proposed increase of $31 per resident ranks sixth among divisions. In percentage terms, it would be a 6% increase, the 18th biggest.

For more information, please see the WeHo by the Numbers article, What are West Hollywood’s budget priorities for 2017?

0 0 votes
Article Rating
ADVERTISEMENT

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

6 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Todd Bianco
8 years ago

@Steve Martin – Each budget item probably includes the payroll for that division. It’s either payroll or payments to independent contractors like Serco or LA County for Sheriffs/Fire. But it would be VERY INTERESTING to know how much the City spends on legal services and how much of that is paid to Mr. Jenkins’ firm. I bet it’s a very large number. Perhaps what would be more interesting is a breakout of salaries by division and a listing of all the contractors by division by amount paid.

Jonathan Simmons
Jonathan Simmons
8 years ago

part 3 @Todd I was surprised when the Walgreen’s project was formally greenlit. As a former attorney in a firm that fouced on and was on the the front line of Practicing WEALTH AND ASSET PROTECTION (anything but a noble cause. We were in the business of making sure our excessively wealthy Clint’s wealth and assets were protected as much as possible from unknown or unforeseeable potential liabilities not covered by insurance that could wipe out vast wealth and return them to avery high end normal wealthy family. Most had thoroughly diverse investments, BUT THE SINGLE BIGGEST RISK WAS ANY… Read more »

Steve Martin
Steve Martin
8 years ago

Did I miss something? What about payroll? I think that is the biggest budget item that seems to be growing at a rate far faster than our population growth. Although we are replacing the 5 city council deputies, it seems the new operation will be costing us substantially more money. Was there an increase in our insurance rates? After the $500,000 to Ian Owens that would be expected. Our legal bills should be up too given the suit by Fran Solomon and the other City Council deputies. The real budget goodies are not going to the residents but to City… Read more »

Manny
Manny
8 years ago

@Todd Bianco….The parking lot planned for the Walgreen’s site will not be permanent…..and the budget to construct it also includes the environmental clean up that is required for any future project.

In the coming years, the City will go through the process of evaluating and considering the many possible permanent uses for the site.

But in the meantime, a parking lot will provide a much needed amenity to the surrounding neighborhood.

K.S.
K.S.
8 years ago

The 8555 Santa Monica Blvd development (Collar & Leash) has invited the neighborhood to a meeting on Wednesday, June 22, 2016 from 6:00 – 7:00 pm. The meeting will be held at 8551 Santa Monica Blvd. (Entrance Behind Collar & Leash through Parking Lot).

I’ve been wondering about Sprouts too………

Todd Bianco
8 years ago

Since the City is putting a surface parking lot for $700k on the vacant (was going to be the Walgreen’s project) lot at the south west corner of Santa Monica and Crescent Heights, I assume the City bought the land from the developer. How much did they pay? The asking $5 million? Good as we need more parking in that area but a surface lot isn’t the best use for that corner. And speaking of stalled developments, what ever happened to the Sprouts project on the south side of SMB at West Knoll? Dead? We also never saw the developer… Read more »