Opinion: Do We Really Need to Add More Letters to the ‘LGBT’ Acronym?

ADVERTISEMENT

Once upon a time, in a glittery land, not so long ago, there was a tribe of people who named themselves the LGBT community, and they were all relatively happy.

As acronyms go it was a very effective one, receiving widespread acceptance, easy to remember and succinctly covering the spectrum of sexual orientations (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender)

As helpful people started to weigh in on the term, it started to take heat for not being inclusive enough. An increasing number of people said that they were having trouble defining themselves on the rainbow of sexualities represented by the LGBT acronym. So, the “Elder Council” held a board meeting and came up with the idea to simply add more letters to the LGBT term in order to keep everyone smiling.

Strangely enough trying to include everyone wasn’t solved by this, and what was intended as a great solution became the cause of many more problems. The brain children that decided to add extra letters to the acronym never anticipated how many more letters would be needed. Before they knew it, the LGBT term became LGBTQQIP2SAA and is continuing to grow.

The letters now stand for:

L: Lesbian. Women who are romantically or sexually attracted to women.

G: Gay: Men who are romantically or sexually attracted to men.

B: Bisexual: A person is romantically or sexually attracted to either sex.

T: Transgender: People who have a gender identity or gender expression that differs from their assigned sex.

Q: Queer. Used to be a derogatory term now taken back and an umbrella term for sexual and gender minorities who are not heterosexual and/or not cisgender. Gay men also use it, which can be confusing.

ADVERTISEMENT

Q: Questioning. A confusing term to most, which is supposed to mean being unsure of your gender identity, being unsure of your sexual orientation, or both, but leads to some people believing it’s a choice.

I: Inter-Sex. A general term used for a variety of conditions in which a person is born with reproductive or sexual anatomy that doesn’t seem to fit the typical definitions of female or male.

P. Pansexual. Pansexuality is often confused with bisexuality. People who identify as pansexual define it in multiple ways. Some people identify as pansexual because they see “bisexual” as not including non-binary trans* people. Other pansexual people explain it as a sexual attraction to people irrespective of gender or sex.

2S: Two Spirit. The term references a tradition common to several Native American tribes, where some individuals possessed and manifested a balance of both feminine and masculine energies, making them inherently sacred people.

A: Asexual. A person who does not experience sexual attraction under most circumstances. An Asexual person may or may not experience romantic attraction.

A: Allies. Which of course is not a sexual orientation. Allies have played an important role in gaining our rights, but this in no way needs to be identified in the acronym.

As the letters were being adde, the meaningless debates began about what the LGBT community should call itself and how to include everyone. Why these have these debates been meaningless? Because we will never be able to come to a universal consensus on what to call ourselves.

Labels themselves are problematic by nature. It’s completely understandable that people feel the need for appropriate descriptive terms that they can identify themselves with. The result however, is often extremely politically correct and incredibly awkward terms that are hard to understand. When people with different disabilities were labeled with terms ranging from “handicapped” to “disabled” (and the most awkward sounding “differently abled”), the result was that no one knew what the proper term is for people with disabilities. It’s the same kind of political correctness and unyielding inclusiveness that is causing the never-ending discussions over what acronym members of the gay community should use to describe themselves.

Unfortunately, the glaring truth is that there will never be an acronym that is inclusive enough, broad enough, politically correct enough to cover every single sexual orientation, sexual identity and sexual minority in our community. If we acquiesce to every single call to include just /.;lkn for inclusiveness sake, the LGBT label will eventually be a meaningless group of endless letters that no one remembers the meanings of.

As a community we should stick with the LGBT+ term that has already in society’s consciousness and has helped us gain widespread acceptance for the most part. We, as a community that detests and has fought so hard against labels, have become society’s biggest hypocrites in claiming such a strong need to labels ourselves. We should not take the LGBT term literally, but instead the LGBT acronym should be an umbrella word that covers all sexual and gender minorities that deviate from the heterosexual norm.

If we as a community are confused by all this, our straight counterparts can not be expected to understand. Especially when some have a hard enough time already dealing with anything other than heterosexuality. Let’s end the confusion and get back to fighting for our rights as a community.

At the end of the day, we are all just trying to make this world a better place for the straight community and the gay community, and that is what we should all be focusing on. The time we spend on labeling ourselves would be better spent on furthering our cause for us and future generations.

5 3 votes
Article Rating
ADVERTISEMENT

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

8 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gallis
Gallis
9 months ago

This is dumb, and no one uses most of these acronyms. At least it isn’t pronounce, which a lot of people take seriously despite being totally fake, like “e, em, eir”.

Mike Austin
Mike Austin
2 years ago

Why not just just use the KISS method – “keep it simple stupid” by just identify as Q+

Can I Turn Represention Off Yet
Can I Turn Represention Off Yet
2 years ago

I guess I got way off the point of the actual article now that I’m thinking about it, sorry. I’m just miserable about how this new wave of “inclusivity” has worsened my life in every concievable way and I just don’t see an end in sight because it just keeps doubling down. I’m sure all the people who love the extra letters are having a great time, but I’m tired of new bells and whistles being added while I’m still being left in the dust. I learned a long time ago that this is not a world that’s at all… Read more »

Mark
Mark
2 years ago

Thanks for the article. This compulsive need to micro-include all walks of life is damaging to the spirit of what the LGBT community stands for. Why the need to add a once derogatory term that essentially means “gay” to the letters is not only redundant but feels like it’s meant to be rubbed in the noses of the “right”, which I might add doesn’t help the cause. The problem with trying to include every non-hetero under our umbrella is that someone is going to feel they’ve been excluded. Let LGBT stand for tolerance in meaning, not in letters of the.… Read more »

John Roche
John Roche
2 years ago

The reason the acronym expands is due to the growing awareness of other communities. May I also add that the ‘A’ stands for Aromantic, asexual, and agender. Wherever this misconception started of it meaning ally, it is incorrect. The definition of being one is that you aren’t a part of the queer community but support it. Also it is often reffered to as the LGBTQAI+ community

Zak
Zak
2 years ago

I love how this is a WORD FOR WORD COPY PASTE of THIS article published 2 whole years prior to this one.

https://dearstraightpeople.com/2015/11/30/why-we-need-to-stop-adding-letters-to-the-lgbt-term/amp/

jean-yves girard
jean-yves girard
3 years ago

you are absolutely right. Je pense la même chose (je vis à Montreal). It’s becoming kind of ridiculous and, because I am gay, I can say it.

Last edited 3 years ago by jean-yves girard
Joseph
Joseph
3 years ago

Interesting read.
I am not LGBT, but always found the acronym to be a good one
The adding of more letters made it kind of tedious, and over-flowing with self-importance.
I mean two-spirits? Isn’t it just venturing into the supernatural with that one?