Opinion: At Least WeHo Didn’t Declare an ‘Official’ Michael Avenatti Day

ADVERTISEMENT
Michael Avenatti, Daniels’ lawyer, at the May 23 “Stormy Daniels Day” event in West Hollywood

They sure know how to pick ‘em! 

But while some of our City Council members have welcomed him to WeHo with open arms on three occasions, at least none of them has (yet) declared a “Michael Avenatti Day.”

Avenatti is/was the lawyer who represented stripper and porn performer Stormy Daniels (remember West Hollywood’s “Stormy Daniels Day”?) in her unsuccessful lawsuits against President Donald Trump. In October of last year, a federal judge dismissed the defamation lawsuit and said Daniels would have to pay Trump’s as-yet-undisclosed legal bills. 

Luckily for Stormy, it seems Avenatti has (or had?) the money to cover that. He was just indicted on 36 counts of fraud, perjury, failure to pay taxes, embezzlement and other financial crimes in which he allegedly raked in millions.

The Los Angeles Times reports that “Avenatti stole millions of dollars from five clients and used a tangled web of shell companies and bank accounts to cover up the theft, the Santa Ana grand jury alleged in an indictment that prosecutors made public Thursday.”

Among those he allegedly ripped off was a mentally ill paraplegic, who never received the $4 million lawsuit settlement Avenatti negotiated. Then there was that client who didn’t receive the $2.75 million settlement he was owed, $2.5 million of which Avenatti allegedly used to buy a private jet. 

ADVERTISEMENT
Stormy Daniels, aka Stephanie Clifford, with Mayor John Duran on left and attorney Michael Avenatti on right.

The City of West Hollywood entertained Avenatti on May 23 when he joined Stormy Daniels for a celebration of what Mayor John Duran declared “Stormy Daniels Day” on the sidewalk outside an adult sex store on Santa Monica Boulevard. She received a proclamation from then Mayor Duran and the key to the city from Councilmember John D’Amico.  The City of West Hollywood received national if not international media coverage, not all of it promoting the city as some of us would like to be seen.

“You two were absolutely giddy,” lesbian activist Ivy Bottini said to Duran and D’Amico in one of a number of criticisms of the event. “You were like 12-year-olds.  Did you have fantasies?”

Then on July 26, Duran invited Avenatti back to WeHo to participate in a panel entitled “An Update on Washington D.C. Politics: the Mueller Investigation, Human Rights and Immigration, and the Future of Resistance.”  Avenatti took time then to say he was thinking of running for President of the United States, which would have added a hilarious second season to the reality TV show that is the White House of today.

And on July 31, Avenatti was featured on a panel moderated by Duran about Trump’s zero-tolerance immigration policies, where opening remarks were delivered by Duran and D’Amico.

So West Hollywood is associated by some with Stormy Daniels and also with Michael Avenatti, whose infamy continues to grow. What’s wrong with that? Nothing if you’re a City Council member with an obsession for national recognition. After all, as the saying goes, “Any publicity is good publicity so long as they spell your name right and it doesn’t involve sex with children.”

But if you’re elected to local office and really have the city’s welfare and reputation at heart, maybe it’s better to focus on local issues, keeping your head bent down over those thick documents on the City Council dais rather than keeping it lifted up to look into TV cameras. Maybe, rather than have the City Council vet which films the Arts Division can screen, the city’s Public Information Office should be vetting who City Council members invite to public events.

And when it comes to issues to focus on, maybe, as Larry Block, West Hollywood’s unofficial rabble-rouser, likes to say: It’s time to “think local!”

0 0 votes
Article Rating
ADVERTISEMENT

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

17 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Michael G.
Michael G.
5 years ago

John Duran is the elephant in the room. How can the WEHO Citizens take him seriously when he has over a dozen federal tax liens amounting to more than $100,000? With that kind of personal debt hanging over your head, should the citizens of West Hollywood not wonder if Duran’s votes regarding commercial projects are not clouded over his obvious financial problems? Unfortunately, we don’t have a Mayor Pete running West Hollywood. He would never allow someone like Duran to continually play and hide behind the “gay card.” Except for Lauren Meister, the other councilmembers seem to be enablers for… Read more »

Darren
Darren
5 years ago
Reply to  Michael G.

Agree with everything you said (except I don’t know much about Meister), but how would the FBI ever know that they should look? Serious question. I doubt they read these boards, so I’m just wondering out of curiosity.

Michael G.
Michael G.
5 years ago
Reply to  Darren

Blogs and online news sites are considered media since a major decision by the Federal Election Commission in 2007 in favor of the Daily Kos and myself after a lawsuit by a conservative blogger against Kos and US Congresswoman Mary Bono against me. Therefore, WEHOville is the main media coverage for West Hollywood and a professional journalistic record of everything surrounding the John Doran issues, etc. It just needs to be pulled together, documented from WEHOville along with news coverage from the LA Times to Daily Mail to file an initial complaint with the FBI. With the WEHO City Council’s… Read more »

Move On
Move On
5 years ago

move on, Move On, MOVE ON! Rehashing this tripe is mindless. Whoever has obsessions with the batch of miscreants is another story but the community should MOVE ON. Marginalize these folks, exclude them from the dialogue Let law enforcement deal with them and move to more productive ideas.

Catherine
Catherine
5 years ago

It was cheesy….. sometimes, that works for Weho. Key to the city should be reserved for a more dignified recipient. And yes, John Duran shows bad judgement, as has been evidenced. And this was another example.

Monica Siegel
Monica Siegel
5 years ago

@Randy. “This publication is obsessed with John Duran”? Hmmm. Let’s see. Duran is chair of GMCLA, whose director is accused of sexually abusing a young man. That’s a story. Duran tells Wehovile that he also was accused. That’s a story. Then the LA Times says three young men accused Duran of sexxual misconduct. That’s a story. Then the LA Times publishes an editorial saying Duran should resign. That’s a story. Then Duran resigns as chair of GMCLA. That’s a story. Then Duran tells a buddy of his that he couldn’t have stuck his hand down the pants of a GMCLA… Read more »

Randy
Randy
5 years ago
Reply to  Monica Siegel

Monica, I’ve read each and every story and editorial. I agree that all, if not most, of what you listed, are stories. But Hank can decide for himself what he decides to be news, and what is not news. Here are some things I think might be non-stories, or re-hashes: – This editorial. This was last year’s news. Much has been said and written about the Stormy Daniels event. – “Motion to censure Duran, City Attorney hasn’t got around to it” – not a story, because they acknowledged that might take a minute. They got to it within two Council… Read more »

weho123
weho123
5 years ago
Reply to  Randy

Duran posts on Grindr do you want to blank the mayors blank and you think this publication is obsessed? or the city pays $500,000 to settle a lawsuit and you think Duran is being singled out. Duran earns the press and like Trump loves it. He don’t care if its good or bad he cares that he is getting laid and using his power to give out commission appointments and money to his pet causes.

Randy
Randy
5 years ago
Reply to  weho123

I clearly stated examples of what I think is over-coverage in my last comment. The Owens affair was covered, and that ship has sailed. I’m talking about recent events, and all of my examples reference recent coverage. As far as Duran being on Grindr, so what? If I was a public figure, I personally would probably would stay off it, mostly because I know that some conservative people would have a problem with it. But I personally don’t have a problem with Duran using Grindr. Who cares? If I can be on it, why can’t he? When and where did… Read more »

Alan Strasburg
Alan Strasburg
5 years ago
Reply to  Randy

The Avenatti indictments made this a very timely and appropriate commentary on the lingering issue of grandstanding in our small town.

Michael G.
Michael G.
5 years ago

As soon as John Duran became “Mayor” he created the Stormy Daniels Day and welcomed this sleazy corrupt lawyer to West Hollywood for one reason: to showboat John Duran. In any other city in the USA, Duran would be history. He would have been forced to resign after endless allegations of sexual harassment, racism, investigations by the L.A. District Attorney plus a $500,000 payout to his assistant he hired after a one night stand from his hook-up on Grindr where he advertises himself still as mayor as you can see from his Facebook account. The city manager, who needs Duran… Read more »

Ham
Ham
5 years ago

West Hollywood has become a national joke. Stop trying to be a “Gay City” and just be a city that works for everyone. Do the basics…..

The City Council is a sad bunch. And we have a Mayor……who can’t even walk the streets without people yelling at him.

Shameful situation.

Manny
Manny
5 years ago

I strongly agree, always have……It’s wise for the council, and future council candidates to focus on local things.

Larry Block
Larry Block
5 years ago

Think Local! Tired of anything but. Fix our problems.

Randy
Randy
5 years ago

Why is this being drummed up, again? We get it, this was a debacle. And this wasn’t an “Avenatti Day.” It was a “Stormy Daniels” day. Not the best idea, but the intention was good. It was a protest against the most corrupt person to hold the highest office in our land, at least since I’ve been alive. Yes, a debacle. But not because anyone knew about Avenatti’s level of corruption at that time. If they did, I’d like to see proof. I admire our City’s ability to not just focus on “local issues,” once in awhile. Even if this… Read more »

Alison
Alison
5 years ago

Birds of a feather….

disgusted
disgusted
5 years ago

Corruption seeks its own level.