City Council candidates make their big debut | WEHO FOR THE PEOPLE FORUM, PART 1

ADVERTISEMENT

Eleven of the 12 candidates in the running for WeHo City Council this November took to the stage Tuesday evening to pitch themselves to the voters at the WeHo for the People Candidate Forum.

Host Robert Kovacik of NBC News asked direct and to-the-point questions on a wide variety of topics during the two-hour forum sponsored by the League of Women Voters and the WeHo Chamber of Commerce, and the candidates came out of the gates looking roundly impressive and well-prepared.

Former child actor Ben Savage of Boy Meets World fame was the only no-show. His campaign did not respond to requests for comment.

INTRODUCTIONS

The field includes several former councilmembers and current city commissioners/boardmembers, as well as a handful of first-time candidates who are new to politics. The three who receive the highest number of votes in November will win a four-year term on City Council. Mayor Lauren Meister is the only incumbent running for re-election.

Host Kovacik opened the forum by asking how long each candidate has resided in West Hollywood. While some have a long history of residency, others like Chelsea Byers and Zekiah Wright were relative newcomers, having lived in WeHo less than one City Council term. It was one of the few questions that all 11 were given the chance to answer — others were divided up and posed to the candidates in groups of three and four. Biographical info was sprinkled throughout their responses during the forum.

YEARS LIVING IN WEHOWHO THEY ARE
Sarah Adolphson16CEO of agency that connects public figures to philanthropic causes, former volunteer for Peace Corps in former Soviet republic of Georgia
Chelsea Byers2Current Human Services Commissioner, 6th Cycle Housing Element Task Force appointee, progressive political activist
Jordan Cockeram9Finance director
Adam Darvish27Current Human Services Commissioner, an executive in the health care industry, immigrated to the U.S. at 18
John Duran3220-year councilmember, helped create city’s dog parks and nightlife shuttle service, attorney, longtime advocate for LGBTQ+ causes and HIV/AIDS patients, faced allegations of misconduct in last term, unseated in last election
John Heilman40One of the founders of West Hollywood, law school professor, highly influential Councilmember who served for 36 years before being unseated in the last election
Steve Martin40Former Councilmember who was behind the reconstruction of Santa Monica Blvd., began as volunteer for city’s founding, advocate for city’s East Side, attorney, regular participant at City Council meetings
Lauren Meister30Current Mayor of West Hollywood, owns and operates a market research firm, started out as a neighborhood watch captain and neighborhood association president, often the lone voice of dissent on City Council
Robert Oliver10Current Public Safety Commissioner, neighborhood advocate, worked for Sen. Diane Feinstein, owns a talent agency with his husband
Marquita Thomas27Current Vice Chair of Planning Commission, CEO of Los Angeles LGBTQ Chamber of Commerce
Zekiah Wright*Awaiting replyFormer Co-Chair of LGBTQ+ Advisory Board, labor and employment litigator, former staff member at U.S. Attorney’s Office, LGBTQ rights advocate

TELEVISING THE FORUM

The candidates uniformly opposed City Council’s decision not to air the forum on WeHoTV, with some calling it a form of censorship.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s an insult to the League of Women Voters and to you Robert that my colleagues decided to censor this event,” said Mayor Lauren Meister, who wanted the forum broadcast on the city’s channel but recused herself from voting on the matter.

“I think that we should be looking for more opportunities to engage the public and to inform the public,” Robert Oliver said. “Democracy should be transparent.”

“This really reflects the dysfunction and the immaturity of the current city council,” said Steve Martin. “It almost boggles the mind, like we’re a Third World republic.”

DEFUNDING THE SHERIFF

Sarah Adolphson
Chelsea Byers↔️
Jordan Cockeram
Adam Darvish❌ 
John Duran
John Heilman
Steve Martin
Lauren Meister
Robert Oliver❌ 
Marquita Thomas
Zekiah Wright↔️
✅ = supported ↔️ = neutral/undecided/equivocal ❌ = opposed

Almost all the candidates opposed the controversial decision by City Council to reduce the sheriff’s budget over the next two years while adding more Block by Block security ambassadors.

“The security ambassadors are unarmed,” said Meister, again the lone voice on City Council to vote against the move. “When they do come have a problem, they call the sheriffs. So now you’re adding 30% more security ambassadors and you’re cutting the number of sheriffs. It doesn’t make any sense.”

Byers and Wright tiptoed around the subject, not endorsing the budget reduction outright but opting for a let’s-wait-and-see-if-it-works approach.

“I am eager to see how this decision plays out,” Byers said. “I am very much in support of clarifying the role of our sheriff’s deputies. We would never expect sheriff’s deputies to write parking tickets in our town because it’s not a good use of their time.”

Thomas and Adolphson spoke out most forcefully against the defunding, and Thomas offered a list of additional measures the city should take to beef up security.

“We need to do business hardening with security cameras, and private security, decoy vehicles,” Thomas said. “We need to expand our COPS team. We need to increase foot patrols, implement the behavioral Crisis Response Unit. We need visual and auditory alerts.”

Adolphson and Heilman pledged to reverse the budget cuts immediately if elected. Darvish proposed the novel idea of placing the Block by Block foot patrols under the direct supervision of the Sheriff’s Department. Cockeram attributed his support of the sheriff to his father, a former police chief.

HOMELESSNESS

Answering how he would address homelessness in WeHo, John Duran assailed his former colleagues’ decision to adapt the former Holloway Motel into transitional housing, and he advocated for involuntary treatment of those who suffer from severe mental illness, a concept Heilman also said he supported.

“It’s time that we really treat this issue like what it is,” Duran said. “Not only compassion, but protecting the people who live and work here.”

Adolphson and Martin expressed hope for the Holloway Motel project if “wrap-around services” were provided and the facility was staffed with full-time behavioral and social workers.

Byers, a former United Way employee, spoke out against “criminalizing” poverty and mental health problems, while trumpeting the social services and non-law enforcement approach favored by the current City Council.

BOARDMEMBERS AND COMMISSIONERS

Duran, Martin, Adolphson and Thomas were questioned as to whether they thought all of WeHo’s boardmembers and commissioners should be required to live within city limits — some of the city’s 13 advisory boards and commissions currently have residency requirements while others don’t — and they were given the chance to suggest other eligiblity criteria they’d like to see instituted.

All four said living in WeHo should be a uniform requirement, with the possible exception of the Transgender Advisory Board. In explaining their reasoning, Duran and Martin pointed to the recent controversy over Public Safety Commissioner Nika Soon-Shiong’s residency. Ongoing efforts to verify whether she lives or has ever lived in WeHo have been obstructed by City Hall, including official Public Information Requests submitted by WEHOville.

“If you’re not willing to let your residential address be published, you should not be a commissioner,” Martin said.

Adolphson said she would also like to see more specific requirements for each board and commission based on their purviews.

“I couldn’t imagine hiring anyone to do a job within my company that doesn’t have the qualifications or the know-how to do that job,” she said.

WHOM DO THEY SERVE?

Heilman, Byers and Wright were asked whether their potential “constituents” included people living beyond the city limits of West Hollywood.

Heilman said he defines “constituents” as residents only, but he noted that future residents are also constituents, as are the city’s businesses. 

“The business community is also part of our constituents, who we have to serve as well,” Heilman said.  “And we do need to be mindful of the impacts of our decisions on those who live on our borders.”

Byers and Wright held similar feelings, pointing out that the city’s weekend and event crowds and those who work but don’t live in WeHo need to be considered as well.

RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT, AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Asked to define “responsible development,” Thomas discussed her role on the Planning Commission approving or denying projects based on such criteria. Duran said environmental concerns must be weighed thoughtfully against the equally daunting problem of limited space for new development in WeHo. He applauded residential growth on commercial corridors like Beverly Blvd. and Melrose Ave. but warned against expansion that would displace residents.

Byers said the city needs to focus specifically on workforce housing and find ways to fast-track developments in order to meet demand. Heilman said parking requirements are a huge obstacle that needs to be addressed, while Wright suggested strategic public/private partnerships to energize developments.

Meister, whose small business task force and idea for a commercial vacancy tax were both lauded by fellow candidates, said the state of California has “tied the hands” of the city in regards to housing, limiting its ability to increase density in zoning. Darvish also opposed Sacramento’s efforts to reduce local control of housing density. Cockeram and Oliver said it’s important to provide a variety of options to builders in order to protect the integrity and character of the city’s diverse neighborhoods.

Darvish said he wanted to “bring down the silo” between the city and the Chamber of Commerce to foster support for small businesses in order to keep them affordable and sustainable. Adolphson envisioned greater community involvement to support mom and pop operations in WeHo. Duran and Wright said the city overregulates entrepreneurs and burdens them with excessive code compliance issues. Thomas and Byers said a more streamlined process is desperately needed for those who wish to start new businesses in town.

“There’s no reason a small business on Santa Monica Blvd. needs 14 months to open,” Byers said.

4.3 3 votes
Article Rating
ADVERTISEMENT

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

93 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Burt
Burt
1 year ago

I would say that 1/3 of these folks should not be running for office. It is clear, what a couple of them are wanting. Opportunistic and agenda pushing. Vote for me because I am gay… or attractive. Yet, one of the most “inclusive” candidates has only white male men in their social media content or campaign materials… But will sprinkle monkeypox vaccination block parties here and there. There is more beyond the smile, there needs to be leadership.

Rodrigo
Rodrigo
1 year ago

Adolphson is hot! She’s getting my vote!

Not Hot
Not Hot
1 year ago
Reply to  Rodrigo

Hit does not equal credible abilities to manage local municipal issues.

Rich Scott
Rich Scott
1 year ago

Ok, so I never heard of Jordan Cockeram until this week. One look at his Instagram posts makes me think he’s more of the typical, shallow Weho guys who’s just wanting to spread more of the ultra progressive ideas like Shyne and Erickson have done. And, after that, move on to a higher elected position asap. Yes, he’s handsome, but all his posts are with other young, attractive friends and Paula Abdul. Where is just one photo op with a disabled person in a wheelchair, or a Russian babushka from the “poorer” side of Weho? Sorry, but he just seems… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by Rich Scott
Rich Scott
Rich Scott
1 year ago

Ok, so I never heard of Jordan Cockeram until this week. One look at his Instagram posts makes me think he’s more of the typical, shallow Weho guys who’s just wanting to spread more of the ultra progressive ideas like Shyne and Erickson have done. And, after that, move on to a higher elected position asap. Yes, he’s handsome, but all his posts are with other young, attractive friends and Paula Abdul. Where is just one photo op with a disabled person in a wheelchair, or a Russian babushka from the “poorer” side of Weho? Sorry, but he just seems… Read more »

Jamie Francis
Jamie Francis
1 year ago

Candidates in my opinion having a certain ability to make points that affects us residents is critical to our needs determines if you should or will be elected. The ability can also be an appreciation of the fact that “all politics is local” and that’s how people should understand it!Not developer money, no outside campaign money from PACs or outside political donors who don’t care of pressing local issues not hardline issues! Not state or national overtones or political operatives or defund police narrative with no viable intentions to be empathetic to residents who are victims of crime. Not lobbyists… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by Jamie Francis
Missing Roadmap
Missing Roadmap
1 year ago
Reply to  Jamie Francis

Thank you for your comment. It would be helpful if those desiring a seat o City Council possessed a Macro/Micro sense of vision that could function throughout the issues West Hollywood faces as a functioning city. Too often there is the PR Window Dressing projected without any attention to exactly how am initiative or concept will function for the benefit of the community. While it is good to have a “bean counter” such as Mayor Meister, with all due respect, it is important to also have scope and the ability to negotiate in a favorable manner. Filling in the blanks… Read more »

J. Erceg
1 year ago

I think the most reasonable thing to do is scrap all of these opportunists. Scratch their names from the list of candidates and start over. This city does not need any existing or previous members of the city government. They have no guts, they are all spineless and without fresh ideas and approach to numerous problems they created themselves. Why we could not get some real candidates that could move this stale group of citizens to new century.

Bill
Bill
1 year ago

Chelsea reading her book report, most likely written by Horvath, is further evidence of why she’s not what the city of WEHO needs. She’s lived in WEHO for two years, during a pandemic, and wants to take the torch of its current failed leadership to burn the city down. No thank you!

Ham
Ham
1 year ago

Meister is the only serious person.

Eric
Eric
1 year ago
Reply to  Ham

Meister is for sure the best, but some of the others are not a complete right off and we have to support and encourage the best of the bunch, to ensure that we have a decent council moving forward. This is so important and I hope the people get out and vote accordingly. Making crazy Sepi a non performer is of the utmost importance, for the well being of all those that live and work in the City.

Jordan Cockeram
1 year ago
Reply to  Ham

Hi Ham,

Mayor Meister certainly has lots of experience! I take the needs and concerns of the residents very seriously, and I’d love to talk to you about your needs and concerns and show you that I’m also a serious candidate! Feel free to email me! 😀 [email protected]

Last edited 1 year ago by Jordan Cockeram
JF1
JF1
1 year ago

Pretty obvious who managed to get the questions in advance..their teleprompter answers give them away. Thanks to the rat that infiltrated the neighborhood groups during the formulation of those questions.

Tom
Tom
1 year ago
Reply to  JF1

It was painful- like watching a Kardashian read the teleprompter during an SNL skit..

Needs a Better Solution
Needs a Better Solution
1 year ago

The Holloway Hotel may be an aspiration in wishful thinking however, a transitional room/apartment with “wrap around services” is not a solution. One’s life cannot be redirected in this manner given the exponential problems one has from living on the street. Needs a better ground up solution and environment. Take a look at the campuses of some of the country’s most successful institutions which were full service entities, not band id “wrap around” services.

Rich Scott
Rich Scott
1 year ago

Have no idea what your point is. Please just be specific. What is wrap around vs full service? Are you in support of Holloway if it was “full service”, whatever that entails?

Losers
Losers
1 year ago

Have never seen or heard from Sarah Adolphson at a single City Council, Planning Commission or Public Safety Commission meeting in the last ten years or so. Could she possibly be looking for cheap exposure to connect public figures to philanthropic causes? If so, quite disingenuous.

Michael Dolan
Michael Dolan
1 year ago

Based on substance, clarity of vision, and experience, The proven leadership of John Heilman, as I expected, rose to the top. I’ll be voting for John Heilman.

Longtime Resident
Longtime Resident
1 year ago
Reply to  Michael Dolan

Oh dear god no. No, no, no. Never again should he be allowed on the city council.

:dpb
:dpb
1 year ago

Agreed. Nor Duran.

93
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x