Council split on giving new crimefighting tech to Sheriff’s Department

ADVERTISEMENT

West Hollywood City Council on Monday narrowly approved new technologies for the Sheriff’s Department including a drone-as-first-responder program, a real-time watch center and fixed real-time cameras throughout the city.

The upgrades, long in discussion, were designed to bolster the city’s public safety profile in a manner similar to Beverly Hills, known for its extensive system of public monitoring. Council’s decision seals the deal on their implementation, allocating $750,000 from the general fund for the improvements.

Vice Mayor Chelsea Lee Byers and Councilmember Sepi Shyne voted against the measure, citing insufficient public outreach and a lack of community engagement. Byers noted only three people showed up to speak during public comment on the item.

“I don’t take that for full consent buy-in, but I take it for not truly noticing or knowing what is coming before the council,” Byers said. “We are focused on making sure that we’re including as many people as possible in these conversations, and given our role tonight in effectively normalizing this very complicated technology in our community, I frankly feel very uncomfortable with doing that without a broader level of conversation in the community.”

The city was recently criticized for not publicizing its push to build bike lanes, which Byers referenced during her comments. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Shyne, who wanted to postpone the upgrades until 2024, argued the situation is different in West Hollywood than it is in Beverly Hills or Santa Monica, which have their own municipal police departments.

“Because we contract with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, we don’t have the same level of control,” Shyne said. “By virtue of our contract, our hands are off, and that provides a different level of duty to our residents to make sure they fully understand what’s happening.”

The drone program is a pilot program intended to last one year. If successful, it may be extended, but it can be halted at any time by the Council if concerns arise. This drone pilot will be limited to responding to service calls, with all flights recorded from start to finish for accountability. The drone will also map crime scenes and traffic accidents, which can significantly reduce the time needed to reopen intersections. Additionally, the drone can be set to record only the sky until reaching its destination to help de-escalate situations and provide real-time information, then revert to sky recording before returning. Digital signage at at least some of the city’s entrances will notify the public that drones are in use, City Manager David Wilson said.

The proposal to add drones, cameras and the watch center to the sheriff’s toolbox was first presented to Council nearly a year ago. Even then, Shyne was skeptical of the sheriff’s authority over the program and its cost, while Councilmembers Lauren Meister and John Heilman were highly in favor.

“I think anything that makes our community feel safer is what we should be doing,” Meister said. “We have the money to do it. We’ve discussed this publicly many times, and I feel like we just keep pushing it. I think we should at least try it. If we don’t like it, then sell the equipment to Santa Monica.”

Heilman was concerned with protecting the people as well as their privacy.

“The LGBT city of freedom has cameras in every LGBT bar, so every time you go into The Abbey or to Rocco’s or any other LGBT establishment, there are cameras monitoring you inside that establishment,” Heilman said. “So my point is that we need to keep the people who are LGBT who are coming here, we need to keep them safe. And the problem is, right now they’re getting robbed on the street, they’re getting hassled on the street, they’re being subjected to hate crimes. Giving the sheriffs the technology to prevent that and to catch the perpetrators is what we’re talking about tonight.”

While harboring some reservations, Mayor John M. Erickson chose to proceed with the upgrades. 

“The reason I support cameras in the public realm is a couple of things,” Erickson said. “We’re already being surveilled; people are watching us right now. I know it doesn’t make it right or wrong, but I would rather err on the side of caution. Regarding the drone, I do share privacy concerns. However, I think I’m willing to go down the path of caution and try it for people. I’ve spoken with my counterparts in Beverly Hills, and I know it’s a different environment. What it looks like is different from city to city, but I do agree with that, and I share the concerns. We’re damned if we do and damned if we don’t.”

Erickson and the other councilmembers took great heat over their decision two years ago to slash the sheriff’s budget, and with Election Day on the horizon, the mayor is under pressure to show he has adequately addressed safety concerns in WeHo. 

On Monday night, he had City Manager Wilson state on record that the measure is “one of the largest single investments that the city’s really been making in public safety over the last few years.”

“There will be instances in the next few months where people say the city does not care about public safety,” Erickson said. “That’s a bald-faced lie meant to scare people. I hope people understand that it’s not the time to scare people but to come together and know we’re taking these things seriously. I think we are showing good results. Part one crime is down, part two crime is down. We still have issues — every city does. But the fear-mongering I’ve seen over the last few years and months, and I think will continue over the next several months, is misleading.”

 

5 2 votes
Article Rating
ADVERTISEMENT

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

25 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Fred
Fred
4 months ago

Would be awesome if 2 of those Defund the Police hags were mugged by their heroes.

em
em
5 months ago

Didn’t they spend money to have a dog mayor inauguration?

WeHo Mary!
WeHo Mary!
5 months ago

Why are these people so worried that someone is watching them? Isn’t everyone in this town constantly trying to be noticed? “I need to be seen!!!” It’s also no longer 1983 when men were in restrooms hooking up and the cops were waiting outside to arrest them.

Jim Nasium
Jim Nasium
5 months ago

Since when does CB and SS care about community input??? In regards to privacy, doesn’t the one year Mayor know that everybody has a camera, a Tiktoc and an instagram account?

Joshua88
Joshua88
5 months ago
Reply to  Jim Nasium

The fact that “everybody has a camera” is not the same as the COPS having a drone flying through the sky.

Like the Supreme Court codifying POTUS immunity when each president comes into office basically leaving hands off the former guy.

So not the same.

Jim Nasium
Jim Nasium
5 months ago
Reply to  Joshua88

That’s a a laughable, desperate and paranoid comparison. Sorry, I’m not concerned about the cops. I’m concerned about the criminals, and social media accounts.

Resident
Resident
5 months ago

The West Hollywood Squad is weak on crime. They have ruined our once great city with their idiotic policies. Shyne is a bizarre fool, but dim-witted Byers is a real and present danger to our community. We need protection from her!

Joshua88
Joshua88
5 months ago
Reply to  Resident

‘Ruined” our great city?

How? How in the world do you blame the council for the sheriffs not being able to PREVENT crime?

Should stop blaming VM Byers, a quite intelligent woman.
…CM Shyne, eh, she’s leaving anyway.

Last edited 5 months ago by Joshua88
Fred
Fred
4 months ago
Reply to  Joshua88

I think Joshua88 is Dangerous Marxist VM Byers.

Eric
Eric
5 months ago
Reply to  Resident

We for sure need protection from anti semite Byers.

Steve Martin
Steve Martin
5 months ago

The City Manager only made the comment that this was one of the biggest increases in our law enforcement budget in response to the Mayor’s assertion that it was the largest. Mayor Erickson seems quite panicked that the public sees him as being weak on crime. Memo to the Mayor: we are NOT blind. As you have often said to people who complained about your cuts to the Sheriffs Department: “I feel safe”. That is not a feeling shared by most WeHo residents.

JF1
JF1
5 months ago
Reply to  Steve Martin

TRUTH.

SeeMe
SeeMe
5 months ago

When Byers runs again, I hope that someone puts up signs around town saying she’d rather spend money on a bike lane on Fountain than on protection for our crime-infested city. It’s astonishing how myopic these two are, completely unable to see the big picture because of their own self-serving agendas.

gdaddy
gdaddy
5 months ago

I’m glad they voted this through, and hope drones are used instead of the more expensive and noise polluting helicopters we deal with consistently.

JF1
JF1
5 months ago

..”the fear-mongering I’ve seen over the last few years and months, and I think will continue over the next several months, is misleading.” I’m sorry, I’ve lived here long enough to know what things were like just a few years back. We are not as safe as we used to be. I used to be able to walk the street at night with no fear. Now I hear my neighbors that have been victims of crime. I read about the crime happening all over. This rise in crime is a direct result (in part) to the failed policies of our… Read more »

Joshua88
Joshua88
5 months ago
Reply to  JF1

Crime is up and down all over the country.

I too remember when murders were extremely rare. There certainly must be a lot of frustration by some marginalized/depressed people, as suicides and crime began exploding years ago.

Cannot blame it on the city council or DA Gascón.

Morty
Morty
5 months ago

The only time a bunch of people show up is when the Unite union hauls in a bunch of fake people who read from scripts provided to them and who don’t live in West Hollywood but claim they want to live close to the hotel where they work.

Steve Martin
Steve Martin
5 months ago
Reply to  Morty

People need to start showing up. You can always appear at Council meetings via Zoom and if you send in emails before hand, they can be included in the public record. Posting here on WeHo Online is not the same as letting people hear your voice at a public meeting. The Public Safety Commission meets next Monday at 6 pm. Lots of opportunities at that meeting to make your opinion matter.

Mikie Friedman
Mikie Friedman
5 months ago
Reply to  Steve Martin

YEP!!

JF1
JF1
5 months ago

Byers and her “conversations.” They don’t listen to the residents when they do speak. No surprise the two radicals voted against the measure. God forbid the sheriffs have the tools they need and requested to help fight crime and respond quicker. I’m guessing the mayor voted in favor of it only because he’s up for re-election. Happy it passed nonetheless. Counting the days until Shyne is gone.

Mikie Friedman
Mikie Friedman
5 months ago

Sepi, who has always been anti-sheriff, is leaving and doesn’t care what people think anymore. Chelsea, who also has been anti-sheriff, isn’t up for reelection, and she knew her anti-safety vote wouldn’t hurt her. But Erickson, who is up for reelection, knew it would be a huge political mistake to vote against public safety measures. IMHO, that’s the only reason he broke up the triumvirate and voted for it..

Nik Roybal
Nik Roybal
5 months ago
Reply to  Mikie Friedman

yep. 100%

Steve Martin
Steve Martin
5 months ago
Reply to  Nik Roybal

Nik, Thank you for speaking at the City Council meeting on this issue. Your comments were accurate and reflective of the reality that we residents experience.

JF1
JF1
5 months ago
Reply to  Mikie Friedman

yup. Truth.

Alan Strasburg
Alan Strasburg
5 months ago
Reply to  Mikie Friedman

You hit the nail on the head on the political calculations of all three. Erickson’s disingenuous arguments now belie his true history of voting for funding cuts in previous sessions. Now he uses the city manager to demand a talking point for his reelection. Shyne and Byers are anti-cop, plain and simple, while Erickson continues to talk out of all sides of his various blowholes. Pathetic excuses for representatives engaged in what should be the nuts and bolts of sound municipal governance. Anyone expecting privacy should stay home, lock the door, and draw the curtains. The rest of us choose… Read more »