Deadline to run for City Council is extended

ADVERTISEMENT

The City of West Hollywood announces an extension of the City Council Candidacy Nomination Period to Wednesday, August 14, 2024 at 5 p.m.

It was previously announced that the Candidacy Nomination Period would end on Friday, August 9, 2024; pursuant to the State Elections Code, a five-day extension may take place if an eligible incumbent does not file Nomination Papers by the deadline.

City of West Hollywood residents who are interested in running for City Council should contact the City Clerk’s office to schedule an appointment to receive nomination papers and to review the requirements and deadlines for becoming an official candidate.

The City Council candidate nomination process requires a potential candidate to gather between 20 and 30 signatures by voters registered in West Hollywood. Potential candidates must be at least 18 years old, residents of West Hollywood, and registered voters within the City.

Two City Council seats will be decided in the upcoming General Municipal Election, which will be held on Tuesday, November 5, 2024. City of West Hollywood Councilmembers each serve for a term of four years and are elected at large. Each year, City Councilmembers select one of their members to serve as Mayor for a year, with the term beginning after the City Council reorganization, which occurs once every year.

ADVERTISEMENT

The City of West Hollywood’s elections page, www.weho.org/elections, provides detailed election information and links to the California Secretary of State’s Voter Registration page, the Los Angeles County Registrar/Recorder’s website, and specific links for polling places and sample ballots.

For more information, to schedule an appointment to receive nomination papers, and to review the requirements and deadlines for becoming an official candidate, please contact the City of West Hollywood’s City Clerk’s Office at (323) 848-6409 or send an e-mail message to Alyssa Poblador at [email protected].

5 1 vote
Article Rating
ADVERTISEMENT

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

12 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cy Husain
4 months ago

I must say I very much like the picture Brandon Garcia chose for the article. A well manicured brown hand with the sleeves showing a high quality suit like those worn by historical greats like Frederick Douglass, Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Vladimir Lenin, Patrice Lumumba and, Malcolm X.✊🏽 A fitting tribute to The Voter Rights Act passed August 6th 1965.☮

VoterRights-Act1
Gimmeabreak
Gimmeabreak
4 months ago

What do you want to bet this was John Erickson’s idea?

Steve Martin
Steve Martin
4 months ago
Reply to  Gimmeabreak

No, this is State law.

Gimmeabreak
Gimmeabreak
4 months ago
Reply to  Steve Martin

Which eligible incumbent did not file their nomination papers before the deadline …. and why not?

Steve Martin
Steve Martin
4 months ago
Reply to  Gimmeabreak

Sepi Shyne. Apparently she had a brief encounter with reality and decided that any attempt at re-election would be embarrassing and pointless.

Gimmeabreak
Gimmeabreak
4 months ago
Reply to  Steve Martin

But since she’s not running why the extension?
Or is the fact that she is “eligible” all it t takes?
Sounds like the kind of logic and inefficiency we should expect from the government.

Larry Block
4 months ago
Reply to  Gimmeabreak

This is a state law that extends the filing period for all municipalities if an incumbent does not pull nomination papers. Ther is nohting nefarious about it. Same thing happened when John DAmico did not run for re-election. Any incumbent can say they are not running and change their mind at the last minute. This gives an extra week to the public to opt in for an open seat.

Cy Husain
4 months ago
Reply to  Steve Martin

YES 👏🏽 ❗ EXTENSION OF NOMINATION PERIOD – “If an incumbent for any office fails to file nomination documents by August 9, 2024 5:00 p.m., the nomination period is extended for five (5) days. During this period, any qualified person, other than the incumbent, may file nomination documents for the office.”

:dpb
:dpb
4 months ago

If an eligible incumbent can’t file paperwork by the deadline it should be too bad and goodbye. Looking at this city and all the deadlines and extensions in every sector of this city, it is a disgusting waste of money, citizens time, business owners time and god I say it, developers time. Delays and extensions are vacant store fronts and derelict properties ready to go up in smoke. And this is exactly what extending the nomination deadline foreshadows: lazy ass politicians that don’t pay attention. What a damn joke for us.

Morty
Morty
4 months ago

I will be writing in my vote for Roger our UPS driver. He is who we need on the city council. I haven’t met one person who doesn’t like Roger.

Steve Martin
Steve Martin
4 months ago

I have two qualifications for any candidate I would consider voting for:

  1. Where were you when the City Council voted to “de-fund” the Sheriff and cut deputies? If you were supportive or silent, don’t expect my vote.
  2. Where do you stand on reducing Fountain Avenue to one lane of traffic in each direction? If you are afraid to take a public position, don’t expect my vote.

I only want to support candidates who support the residents and are not beholden to outside power brokers.

Cy Husain
4 months ago
Reply to  Steve Martin
  1. LASD funding through out the 21st century consistently INCREASED with only a slight dip in 2018. All while CRIME especially violent crime has been decreasing
  2. Nonpharmaceutical containment methods were necessary to contain the lethal COVID-19 Pandemic ☣ and many lives were saved.
  3. If you REALLY support the people over outside power brokers, there’s an option you’re overlooking.
los-angeles-sheriff-budget-chart-abc-jt-221014_1665779148532_hpEmbed_22x15_992