Residents rage against runaway bike lane project

ADVERTISEMENT

More than 100 West Hollywood residents filled the community room at Plummer Park on Thursday night to vent their anger at city plans to remove street parking along Vista and Gardner avenues, part of the wider Willoughby, Vista/Gardner, and Kings Street Design Concept Plan.

Their ire was largely directed at City Council and particularly at Vice Mayor Chelsea Lee Byers, who was in attendance. Residents repeatedly brought up a comment the vice mayor made earlier in the year regarding the project — that she would “happily inconvenience motorists for the safety of cyclists” — and more than one called for her resignation.

WeHo Long Range Planning Manager Francisco Contreras described the project as a “sketch,” still years in the making and able to be changed.

“It’s not a done deal,” Contreras said. “The concept plan is really just a sketch—an idea. What we’re going to do now is develop that idea and incorporate some of the comments from both the City Council and the ones we’ve heard here today. We’re going to try really hard to find a compromise. Maybe we won’t lose any parking; maybe we lose some parking; maybe we don’t lose all of it. Some of that exploration is going to be part of the next phase of the project as we start to develop that sketch into real plans. And that process alone is going to take at least a year—just turning the sketch into some more refined designs will take at least a year. Once we actually have a refined design instead of just a sketch, that’s when we engage with our public safety team because they can’t respond to a sketch. When we show them a line, they say, ‘I can’t tell you anything—I don’t have enough information or details.’ Once we have more of a refined sketch and plans with actual measurements, that’s when we go to our public safety team, fire, and emergency personnel and say, ‘Look, here’s what we’re thinking.’ For example, if the roadway was 60 feet and we’re thinking about turning that into 40 feet, how does that impact response times? At this early stage, we just don’t have enough information for them to respond to.”

The following are notable quotes from various attendees at the meeting:

“I’m not surprised that no one really knew about this. It’s the same City Council that decided to tear down a synagogue during COVID when no one knew about it. They don’t care about our wants and needs—they have a plan, and we’re not part of that plan. They treat us like children, instead of improving what’s there. They treat us like they’re the parents and know what’s best for us instead of treating us like adult.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think all kinds of people can get around by modes outside of the single-occupant vehicle, and that’s one of our goals on a local and regional level. I know a lot of folks personally, and I’ve heard a lot of people say in this meeting that they would love to ride a bike to get around and love to use public transit, and this is how we become that city. The transition is hard—I don’t want to undermine that—it’s difficult.”

We were a bit surprised when Mayor Erickson, Vice Mayor Byers, and Councilmember Shyne voted for Option 1A, which would impact residents way more than Option 1, as 1A clearly states there would be a loss of residential parking—particularly for residents who live in older buildings with no off-street parking at all. We are, however, angry that if this goes through, 60 spaces will be lost as there are 51 driveways between Norton and Gardner, all of which are perpendicular to the plan. That makes a total of 60 residents whose lives will be upended and disrupted daily.”

I drive Uber at night and on weekends. My issue is, like, I pick up people—like last night, I picked up a couple from Norton, and they didn’t even know they’re going to take away our parking spots.”

What I am disturbed by is that instead of creating a compromise between drivers and bicyclists, we have at least three new members of the City Council who seem to want to create division in this city instead of bringing us together, which is not who we are and not what we’re meant to be. Those three council members, however… What I’d also like to say is that you have to consider that if you take streets that are too narrow and make them into bike lanes, you’re going to have accidents, and that’s going to ruin the lives of both the motorists and the bicyclists.”

Some people are using West Hollywood to advance their own careers, and they don’t consider the needs of the residents of West Hollywood. I’m all for bikes and alternative modes of transportation, but we have to incentivize those first and get people to take them before we get rid of parking spaces.”

People are saying they don’t want it, they’re saying it’s not going to work for so many reasons. Legitimate concerns are being brought up, but there are no responses. It’s called a Q&A—we’re making comments, but there are no answers to any of these things. What are the solutions to the safety issues? What are the solutions for folks walking to their cars and not finding parking, or for emergency vehicles? It seems like a sort of waste of time to bring the community in and say, ‘Let us know your concerns,’ and then we leave here not knowing any more than when we arrived.”

I can hardly even walk these days, so I’m very car-dependent. I am incredibly fortunate I can park in my own driveway, but I really care about the community. And this whole plan came before outreach to the community. I don’t care how many years ago there was outreach — these people were left out of the conversation.”

People like myself chose to live in this beautiful city for its charm and prime location. Inconveniencing motorists creates a domino effect not only for residents of West Hollywood but also for the greater Los Angeles area. This is not something to be proud of — a legacy of becoming a city that has abused taxpayers’ dollars for political gain and exposure is not what our community signed up for.”

As someone who has been taken to the hospital multiple times in an ambulance and lives next to a nursing home where people are constantly being taken to the hospital, I think you should really look into this instead of just rolling your eyes. Like I said before, that kind of reflects more on you and how you care about the people you represent.”

We don’t need bike lanes; we certainly don’t need them here. People have made perfect points that bikes can easily go down the sides of the street without having to have a bike lane. There’s never been a problem. It seems like there’s a problem that you are trying to solve that doesn’t exist.”

 

3.4 7 votes
Article Rating
ADVERTISEMENT

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

65 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Steve Martin
Steve Martin
23 days ago

News Flash! In obvious response to this meeting, Mayor Erickson is having a meet and greet to talk about issues Saturday, August 31st from 11:30 a.m. to 1 p.m. Fortunately for the residents, this is an election year.
Remember, if his lips are moving……

trackback

[…] city tells us the bike lanes on Fountain, Santa Monica, Willoughby and Gardner are far off, but the bills are already piling up — $31,017.21 for plans, specifications and estimates for […]

S. J. Harker
S. J. Harker
18 days ago

Staff stated at this meeting $300K to $400K so far.

Mike The Point
Mike The Point
24 days ago

Meanwhile we have the same broken sidewalks with the same locked sidewalks by overgrown vegetation. The cross signals should automatically turn white and not require a button pressed. Intersection should be made safer by adding left turn Lanes at Fountain and Crescent Heights and Santa Monica for example. Take a casual walk after dark in West Hollywood and you will see you are clearly outnumbered by the unhoused and the unhinged. It’s easy to spot the meth dealer. I think Sheriff has abandoned us or our ersatz leaders ask them to look out for the cartels instead of us. Cartels… Read more »

Cy Husain
23 days ago
Reply to  Mike The Point

Yes there has been a significant & consistent increase of meth use in the U.S. but, the ease of individual manufacture keeps Cartels from gaining any significant control much less a monopoly. Yes the sheriff’s deputies 🐷 are reactionary thugs but, NOT stupid enough to allow cartel losers to gain control of them. The unhoused are more a threat to themselves than anyone else. Transportation & infrastructure are well on the way of being fixed up like never before to the point of making you feel this is a good time to be alive❗

Mike The Point
Mike The Point
24 days ago

The idea is to get you into a driving service. Google’ Waymo already does 100K rides a week driverless. That is no less than 1,000 jobs gone by the way. Plus jobs supporting car ownership. Kamala Harris’s brother-in-law Tony West helps run Uber. Valerie Jarrett is on the board of Lyft. Uber will start using Cruise from Government Motors, GM, in 2025. That news was hidden in obscure channels. Getting rid of the parking is a step towards control and outright profiteering. Tim Walz even vetoed a bill passed by the Minnesota Legislature giving drivers a raise. Funny his running… Read more »

West
17 days ago
Reply to  Mike The Point

Fascinating, thanks for the insights

Johnny
Johnny
24 days ago

This is stupid. Will we suddenly see dozens upon dozen bike riders. This is not a city where people in mass ride bikes- we need our cars as we are commuter city. Original investors in Lime did it to simply see how many people would use one to go a mile. And you see those things lying all over sidewalks. We do not want to remove parking for residents first and their friends second. It’s a simply unreasonable idea that needs to be put to bed and buried 6 feet. You have a corrupt city management team as it is.… Read more »

John McCormick
John McCormick
24 days ago

Increase the Trolley days/times, add routes to those little Weho buses. Add bike racks on them, like metro has. We live together in about 2 square miles, we need to think together.
Bottlenecking Fountain to the rest of Los Angeles is dangerous and selfish. Forcing people out of their vehicles is government overreach. Making a mom with kids park two block from home after dark is simply dangerous is a city lacking currently in sheriff coverage.
IMHO this is a Byers Utopia that needs immediate attention in our next election.

Frank
Frank
24 days ago

I still don’t understand why any city official thinks public transportation is a safe option when there are so many mentally unstable people riding on it for free every single day. Let’s worry about getting these people institutionalized instead of taking away parking spots so we can actually ride public transportation. Also, Gardner does not need a bike lane because it is already wide enough.

Last edited 24 days ago by Frank
Cy Husain
24 days ago
Reply to  Frank

Actually Public Transportation🚈 is substantially safer than driving, according to a new study by the American Public Transportation Association (APTA), taking public transit can reduce the risk of being in an accident by more than 90% compared to driving. The “mentally unstable people” you should be worried about are behind the wheel of an automobile. Bike Lanes will not only provide safe biking but, also reduce the excess parking contributing to the dangerous car problem❗ 

Your Mom
Your Mom
24 days ago

SAVE OUR PARKING! I haven’t seen any momma representation, so I’m here to rep all the mommas on Gardner street! I’m a mom with a very young kid and taking away our parking would be dangerous. It’s already tough finding parking so taking away over 60 spots would make it impossible. I don’t feel safe waking around our neighborhood and I definitely can’t ride a bike to and from school, my work, the grocery store…. With a kid.. etc. It’s impossible. And public transportation is abysmal, dangerous and also not an option. We do live on Gardner and our ring… Read more »

Ida Lupino
Ida Lupino
24 days ago

 Measure HLA just passed in February 2024 with 65% of the vote. You think that 100 speaks for the majority? Put it to a referendum…and keep that 65% in mind. The MAJORITY are sick of pollution, speeding cars, constant traffic on a street that is RESIDENTIAL and should have never been changed.

Last edited 24 days ago by Ida Lupino
Steve Martin
Steve Martin
24 days ago
Reply to  Ida Lupino

Ida, I agree that reducing Fountain to a single lane in either direction should be submitted to a vote of the residents. Great idea! It would really foster a more constructive debate and perhaps generate some creative alternatives.

S. J. Harker
S. J. Harker
25 days ago

NO! The 100 people were primarily the residents of Gardner who would be DIRECTLY impacted by this plan and were speaking for themselves. I doubt seriously, that 100 people who live on, oh let’s say Hayworth, or anywhere else in the city, would even CARE about what’s going on, on Gardner, let alone the fact that even the Gardner residents didn’t KNOW about the plan to remove their street parking until AFTER the radical-left three on council voted in favor of the plan — AND make no mistake it IS a plan not a “sketch”. NONE of the outreach that… Read more »

IMG_5834
CHLOE ROSS
CHLOE ROSS
24 days ago
Reply to  S. J. Harker

SJ HARkKER is right on the money. The absurdity of this “bike lane”plan” is enormous. Ask any resident of WeHo who has lived in a college town or city where bicycles and cars live in some sort of detente. I have and have lived in London and NYC and SF and Boston and Cambridge where the relationship between autos and bikes is a delicate balance of sentient individuals who’ve learned the rules of the road and extreme courtesy in sharing those roads and wild west wannabes who wind up in body casts. I also know Los Angeles and other large… Read more »

Morty
Morty
23 days ago
Reply to  CHLOE ROSS

Great insight Chloe. Everyone in LA is in a hurry. We have some of the worst drivers anywhere. I worry about how many people (especially kids) are going to get injured or killed before they realize this is not a very good idea. They installed bike lanes in our neighborhood and I never see any bike riders. If I thought the streets of LA were safe I would ride a bike but they are not safe even after adding bike lanes. It’s like electric cars. They are pushing everyone to an electric car without having the infrastructure in place. So… Read more »

CHLOE ROSS
CHLOE ROSS
23 days ago
Reply to  Morty

THANK YOU! The issue is so complicated and is being treated like a playground issue!

Morty
Morty
25 days ago

The problem is the arrogance by a few city council members who were dismissive of the concerns of people who actually live in the area and on those streets. The people who are directly affected have a right to know the plans and the city really has an obligation to come up with a solution to replace those sorely needed parking spaces. To just simply remove 60 parking spots is not an option. I have worked with Adrian Gallo multiple times. He is a great guy and I am sure he will do everything he can to address many of… Read more »

CHLOE ROSS
CHLOE ROSS
24 days ago
Reply to  Morty

Yes!

Pedro B
Pedro B
25 days ago

Not sure why you wouldn’t publish my earlier comment, but you have to explain why certain council members put their personal agendas before the majority of residents, many of whom are not eligible to vote due to primary residency requirements. Thank you.

Singleguywh
Singleguywh
24 days ago
Reply to  Pedro B

What do you mean “not eligible to vote”? Do you have any evidence to support your claim? Many of us have lived in WeHo for decades – particularly those in rent-controlled apartments.

CHLOE ROSS
CHLOE ROSS
24 days ago
Reply to  Pedro B

Yes, I’d like an answer too.