Fountain Avenue becomes battleground for rival political factions

ADVERTISEMENT

Fountain Avenue has become the prime battleground in local politics as rival factions vying for seats in next month’s City Council races hope to woo voters who are either excited or worried about the streetscape project that intends to replace two lanes of traffic on the avenue with protected bike lanes.

The streetscape project has divided residents, many of whom were caught off-guard by plans to remove significant amounts of street parking. 

Adding fuel to the fire has been a string of serious car collisions on Fountain, the most recent of which occurred at 11:30 a.m. today. Proponents of the bike lanes say these crashes prove the need for the streetscape project, even though its focus is on improving safety for pedestrians and cyclists. 

A protest of the project has been planned for 3:30 p.m. Friday at the corner of Crescent Heights and Fountain.

While neighborhood activists Kathy Blaivas and Stephanie Harker say they laid the groundwork for the protest, it’s now sponsored by WeHo For The People, a political advocacy organization launched by the West Hollywood Chamber of Commerce in 2022, along with several neighborhood watch associations.

ADVERTISEMENT

WeHo for The People is chaired by Alan Strasburg, who is also candidate George Nickle’s treasurer. 

The Chamber’s political action committee, WEHO PAC, is funding and operating a campaign to assist Nickle and fellow candidate Zekiah Wright, both of whom have spoken out against the bike lanes, in getting elected to City Council.

Supportive of the project are Mayor John M. Erickson and Danny Hang, an unofficial slate backed by labor union UNITE HERE Local 11 and special interests group like Streets for All, which holds a financial interest in seeing the project come to fruition. 

Collision today on Hayvenhurst and Fairfax (Photo credit Jimmy Moriarty-Martinez)

The debate widened over the past week after a two-car collision on Fountain and Spaulding led to the death of one of the drivers. A second crash occurred at Fairfax and Fountain a few days later, followed by today’s crash at the Hayvenhurst insection. Supporters of the bike lanes have said thicker traffic and slower speed limits would prevent speeding and reckless driving on the road — some in more forceful terms.

In an Instagram post, former Councilmember John D’Amico appeared to implicate Nickle and Councilmember John Heilman, also an opponent of the project, in the tragedy.

“Hey John and George, someone died in a traffic accident on Fountain last night,” he wrote. “Whatever you do make sure Fountain stays unsafe.”

The post was brought up during Monday night’s meeting of the Public Safety Commission, of which Nickle is a member, with several public commenters denouncing the attack. 

“It’s hate speech,” Nickle said. “It’s vile, and it is using the death of a person.”

However, Kevin Burton of the WeHo Bicycle Coalition, another beneficiary of the streetscape project, also tried to frame the tragedy as one that could be prevented by bike lanes.

“I just want to say that this sort of high-speed switching of lanes that goes on along Fountain Avenue does not occur on 95% of the length of that avenue going east of La Cienega,” Burton said. “One of the goals of reducing to one lane in each direction is to improve the safety of drivers because that kind of high-speed back-and-forth will go away. Even now, most of the day, it’s one lane in each direction because of all the parked cars, so it won’t be that much of a difference.”

Earlier in the meeting, Nickle and Chair Adam Eramian probed Fire Battalion Chief Chad Sourbeer and Community Safety Director Danny Rivas for further details about the project’s impact on emergency response times.

“Has the city reached out to you, to the fire department, to form a plan for how emergency vehicles will get down Fountain Avenue if there was an accident or incident that needs a response?” Eramian asked.

“No, I don’t think the fire department can even speak on something like that until we see something,” Sourbeer said. “We have nothing to talk about.”

Rivas said that once a formal plan is developed, it will be routed through the appropriate city departments for input from outside agencies, including the fire department. However, he claimed no plan has been submitted at this stage.

Nickle pressed him further. 

“The grant that was approved actually does say the city will reduce auto capacity by reducing the number of travel lanes and removing on-street parking for protected bike lanes and widened sidewalks along East-West Fountain Avenue,” Nickle said. “So, I know there may not be detailed blueprints or anything, but I would certainly think that even at this stage, because I know that it was a concern in the city of Los Angeles—there weren’t plans, it was just simply put out there—the people and the union for the firefighters came forward, and they said this will reduce 911 response times. So, if the plan is to do this on Fountain Avenue, and we’re getting $8.2 million, the state’s not going to give us $8.2 million without anything. This is what was approved. Then, surely we should be reaching out already to our first responders to just say, ‘You use Fountain. You’re going to have fewer lanes. There aren’t going to be places for cars to pull over if you come up behind them. What will this do to response times?'”

We value everybody’s comments, but for the sake of our meeting here, again, this is an item that’s not agendized, and so we’re limited in what we can discuss as it relates to that project specifically,” Rivas replied.

“Sure, but I mean, we’re discussing fire issues, and this would impact their response times, at least according to other firefighter unions,” Nickle said. “So, I thought it was something that we could certainly discuss. I know that Athens has been reached out to—it was brought up at a previous commission meeting—but their response wasn’t relayed to the public. I reached out to Athens, and their response was, ‘If you do this, it will back up traffic out of the city.’ Athens was actually taken and shown the city’s plans—what they were going to do and where—and this was their response. So anyway, we should continue the conversation.”

 

 

3.7 3 votes
Article Rating
ADVERTISEMENT

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

47 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Olen
Olen
2 months ago

Yo an ambulance will be able to get through stop being silly

Jordan
Jordan
2 months ago

Let’s step away from politics— back to the numbers! Why not look at the actual parking study the city did about the parking situation on Fountain? From the Engage Weho Project Page: The City conducted a parking utilization study in Fall 2022 and found that midday and overnight occupancy levels were at just 60%. During midday and overnight, there are roughly 320 parking spaces [on Fountain Avenue.] Ok, let’s break this down: 60% of 320 spots = 192 spots 320 spots – 150 spots (the parking loss number being thrown around) = 170 spots 192 spots – 170 spots = 22 Spots… Read more »

Steve Martin
Steve Martin
2 months ago
Reply to  Jordan

Interesting but we don’t have the data as to the location where the parking will be removed; will it be from the high use areas or low use areas? Exactly where are those areas? You are assuming that the City’s use “use” numbers are correct, and that is always a dangerous assumption. The point is, it would make sense for residents to know where the parking is being removed before it becomes a done deal. I agree with your analysis that more real information is needed so we can talk real numbers.

Terry Dale Oleson Oleson
Terry Dale Oleson Oleson
2 months ago
Reply to  Steve Martin

As usual, Steve Martin addresses a very important issue and that the city of West Hollywood has promoted a drastic traffic plan affecting so much of the city, it would be very nice to know the details of the plan. It is not just about parking, though, it is the assessed backup of traffic congestion on Fountain Avenue that will increase if two lanes of traffic are removed.

Jesse Budlong
Jesse Budlong
2 months ago

I like how the author Brandon is uninformed that the parking will be lost due to expanding the sidewalks to meet ADA compliance.

So either you care about functioning sidewalks or storage for private vehicles in the public right-of-way.

Don Jones
Don Jones
2 months ago

I see former Councilmember John D’Amico is up to his tired old stir the anti-Heilman pot. Hey John, it’s 2024 and you’re no longer relevant.

Uron
Uron
2 months ago

Attempting to make parking so difficult will not change car ownership behavior. It will give more reason for residents to move out of Weho. If that happens and they live in rent control apartments, those apartments will immediately go to market rate. So much for Erickson and Hang’s pitch for affordable housing. Also, any apartment with a parking spot along fountain or nearby will jump at a premium.

Erickson and Hang cannot look beyond the moment to actually understand the impact of the silly ideas.

It’s all a political amateur stunt for Erickson and Hang

Jesse Budlong
Jesse Budlong
2 months ago
Reply to  Uron

No it’s about widenign sidewalks to ADA compliance. Caring more about vehicle parking than people being able to walk down a street is just selfish. Park your car on your private property. Not public!

Last edited 2 months ago by Jesse Budlong
Steve Martin
Steve Martin
2 months ago
Reply to  Jesse Budlong

Forcing people out of their affordable units is not “progressive”

Long Time Resident
Long Time Resident
2 months ago
Reply to  Jesse Budlong

Your argument lacks some merit. Many of the people that park on Fountain do not have off-street parking. Also, are they not allowed to have.visitors

Terry Dale Oleson Oleson
Terry Dale Oleson Oleson
2 months ago
Reply to  Uron

Uron’s post addresses the actual source of all of these ridiculous, proposed changes to Fountain Avenue, the uninformed, simple-minded, overly idealistic ideas of John Ericson and his mentors.

Jamie Francis
Jamie Francis
2 months ago

In my view Fountain will be more unsafe with drivers getting more impatient or more insistent to cut through the neighborhood side streets. More than before drivers and pedestrians will be hit by drivers speeding and cutting through side streets as we saw with recent car crash tragedies. It is notoriously dangerous and unpredictable as a resident like myself who walks everywhere. I rely on walking on streets but I am becoming more hesitant with using crosswalks with yield signals since it is not compelling drivers to stop and yield to a pedestrian’s right of way at a cross walk… Read more »

Last edited 2 months ago by Jamie Francis
Jordan
Jordan
2 months ago
Reply to  Jamie Francis

I agree that walking in weho can be a dangerous endeavor. Anyone who walks here would agree with us. You complain about scooters and bikes on the sidewalks (I agree this is an issue), but yet you’re somehow against removing them from the sidewalk by giving them a separate lane to travel in. Let’s support solutions to our problems. Also, I’ve had many close calls crossing streets here as a pedestrian. All of my near death experiences have been at marked crosswalks where there are 2 lanes of traffic in each direction. The car closest to me stops to let… Read more »

Last edited 2 months ago by Jordan
Steve Martin
Steve Martin
2 months ago

I question your headline describing the debate over Fountain as simply a political football between “rival factions”. It is really a City Council majority aligned with Streets for All and Unite Here vs. the impacted residents. While I am not saying that all residents oppose Fountain, but the vast majority who have learned about the “re-design” are very opposed to it. The headline trivalizes both sides of the controversy which is not fair to either side. I have been around a while and I have never seen a proposal since we implemented Rent Control that impacts the lives of so… Read more »

Jordan
Jordan
2 months ago
Reply to  Steve Martin

This is an unfair accusation to make. You seek to categorize certain voices in the community as unworthy of being considered because of their opinions. At the city council meeting where the grant was voted on, many local residents, including me, spoke in support of this project and outlined the ways it would improve our lives and make us safer. The only “special interest” I have is that I don’t want my partner to worry for my life every time I wheel my bicycle out of the front door. Maybe given your disposition and stance on this issue the people… Read more »

Terry Dale Oleson Oleson
Terry Dale Oleson Oleson
2 months ago
Reply to  Steve Martin

Every WeHo resident whom I have met are incredibly opposed to the proposed reduction of two traffic lanes on Fairfax Avenue. Outside unions funded John Ericson’s election so that the WeHo city Council could vote in the highest minimum wage law in in California, and most of those union members don’t even live in West Hollywood. The WeHo City Council has an anti-business attitude that don’t care how many small businesses in WeHo are still out of business because of overly idealistic minimum wage laws. Most of these businesses aren’t on Fountain Avenue, passing all of the empty stores on… Read more »

John
John
2 months ago

Sounds like a campaign stunt for Nickle . He did the same thing g with the neighborhood watch list.

Steve Martin
Steve Martin
2 months ago
Reply to  John

John, sorry to disappoint you but George Nickle never had access or control of the Eastside Neighborhood Watch email list or membership list.
Steve Martin, Chair Eastside Neighborhood Watch.

Roger
Roger
2 months ago

Why doesn’t this article mention that Larry Block, a major opponent of the Fountain Streetscape project, is the publisher of this website? Journalistic malpractice.

(to the mods, if you have any dignity approve this comment)

Jordan
Jordan
2 months ago

Brandon, you’re missing a key piece of context to this discussion: The bike lanes are irrelevant to the opposition’s stance on this project. I don’t know how hard it is to get this through people’s heads— even without bike lanes, Fountain Avenue will have to have lose parking and a travel lane. At the very least for many sections of the street. Any work done to Fountain will require that the sidewalks be brought up to code and made ADA compliant. Go walk along Fountain, there’s so little extra space currently. To add multiple feet to the sidewalks on each… Read more »

hifi5000
hifi5000
2 months ago

I hope the city knows what they are getting into if they proceed with this bike-lane plan.Maybe they should consider another way to control traffic.

I say Fountain Ave. needs to be split up,so there will not be the through traffic that belongs on Sunset and Santa Monica Boulevards.Those boulevards were built to handle heavy traffic.Fountain Ave. is not designed that way and can be considered a residential street.Just because traffic is coming from Los Angeles proper,West Hollywood should not have to accept it.

Bri
Bri
2 months ago

Since when is road safety political? Why is saving lives here a contentious issue? It’s making me realize that we live in a death cult where people prioritize parking spots over lives and public safety, and WeHo community members cannot imagine a better future for ourselves. It’s sad. The local politics is sooo disappointing. George Nickle is running on a single-issue pro-parking platform when we have bigger fish to fry. The pro-parking element itself is inconsistent with other policies he supposedly endorses. On the one hand, he claims to support ADA-compliance and beautification on Fountain, which necessitates reducing traffic and… Read more »