Fountain Avenue becomes battleground for rival political factions

ADVERTISEMENT

Fountain Avenue has become the prime battleground in local politics as rival factions vying for seats in next month’s race for City Council races hope to woo voters who are either excited or worried about the streetscape project that intends to replace two lanes of traffic on the avenue with protected bike lanes.

The streetscape project has divided residents, many of whom were caught off-guard by plans to remove significant amounts of street parking. 

Adding fuel to the fire has been a string of serious car collisions on Fountain, the most recent of which occurred at 11:30 a.m. today. Proponents of the bike lanes say these crashes prove the need for the streetscape project, even though its focus is on improving safety for pedestrians and cyclists. 

A protest of the project has been planned for 3:30 p.m. Friday at the corner of Crescent Heights and Fountain.

While neighborhood activists Kathy Blaivas and Stephanie Harker say they laid the groundwork for the protest, it’s now sponsored by WeHo For The People, a political advocacy organization launched by the West Hollywood Chamber of Commerce in 2022, along with several neighborhood watch associations.

ADVERTISEMENT

WeHo for The People is chaired by Alan Strasburg, who is also candidate George Nickle’s treasurer. 

The Chamber’s political action committee, WEHO PAC, is funding and operating a campaign to assist Nickle and fellow candidate Zekiah Wright, both of whom have spoken out against the bike lanes, in getting elected to City Council.

Supportive of the project are Mayor John M. Erickson and Danny Hang, an unofficial slate backed by labor union UNITE HERE Local 11 and special interests group like Streets for All, which holds a financial interest in seeing the project come to fruition. 

Collision today on Hayvenhurst and Fairfax (Photo credit Jimmy Moriarty-Martinez)

The debate widened over the past week after a two-car collision on Fountain and Spaulding led to the death of one of the drivers. A second crash occurred at Fairfax and Fountain a few days later, followed by today’s crash at the Hayvenhurst insection. Supporters of the bike lanes have said thicker traffic and slower speed limits would prevent speeding and reckless driving on the road — some in more forceful terms.

In an Instagram post, former Councilmember John D’Amico appeared to implicate Nickle and Councilmember John Heilman, also an opponent of the project, in the tragedy.

“Hey John and George, someone died in a traffic accident on Fountain last night,” he wrote. “Whatever you do make sure Fountain stays unsafe.”

The post was brought up during Monday night’s meeting of the Public Safety Commission, of which Nickle is a member, with several public commenters denouncing the attack. 

“It’s hate speech,” Nickle said. “It’s vile, and it is using the death of a person.”

However, Kevin Burton of the WeHo Bicycle Coalition, another beneficiary of the streetscape project, also tried to frame the tragedy as one that could be prevented by bike lanes.

“I just want to say that this sort of high-speed switching of lanes that goes on along Fountain Avenue does not occur on 95% of the length of that avenue going east of La Cienega,” Burton said. “One of the goals of reducing to one lane in each direction is to improve the safety of drivers because that kind of high-speed back-and-forth will go away. Even now, most of the day, it’s one lane in each direction because of all the parked cars, so it won’t be that much of a difference.”

Earlier in the meeting, Nickle and Chair Adam Eramian probed Fire Battalion Chief Chad Sourbeer and Community Safety Director Danny Rivas for further details about the project’s impact on emergency response times.

“Has the city reached out to you, to the fire department, to form a plan for how emergency vehicles will get down Fountain Avenue if there was an accident or incident that needs a response?” Eramian asked.

“No, I don’t think the fire department can even speak on something like that until we see something,” Sourbeer said. “We have nothing to talk about.”

Rivas said that once a formal plan is developed, it will be routed through the appropriate city departments for input from outside agencies, including the fire department. However, he claimed no plan has been submitted at this stage.

Nickle pressed him further. 

“The grant that was approved actually does say the city will reduce auto capacity by reducing the number of travel lanes and removing on-street parking for protected bike lanes and widened sidewalks along East-West Fountain Avenue,” Nickle said. “So, I know there may not be detailed blueprints or anything, but I would certainly think that even at this stage, because I know that it was a concern in the city of Los Angeles—there weren’t plans, it was just simply put out there—the people and the union for the firefighters came forward, and they said this will reduce 911 response times. So, if the plan is to do this on Fountain Avenue, and we’re getting $8.2 million, the state’s not going to give us $8.2 million without anything. This is what was approved. Then, surely we should be reaching out already to our first responders to just say, ‘You use Fountain. You’re going to have fewer lanes. There aren’t going to be places for cars to pull over if you come up behind them. What will this do to response times?'”

We value everybody’s comments, but for the sake of our meeting here, again, this is an item that’s not agendized, and so we’re limited in what we can discuss as it relates to that project specifically,” Rivas replied.

“Sure, but I mean, we’re discussing fire issues, and this would impact their response times, at least according to other firefighter unions,” Nickle said. “So, I thought it was something that we could certainly discuss. I know that Athens has been reached out to—it was brought up at a previous commission meeting—but their response wasn’t relayed to the public. I reached out to Athens, and their response was, ‘If you do this, it will back up traffic out of the city.’ Athens was actually taken and shown the city’s plans—what they were going to do and where—and this was their response. So anyway, we should continue the conversation.”

 

 

3.7 3 votes
Article Rating
ADVERTISEMENT

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

37 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jesse Budlong
Jesse Budlong
2 hours ago

I like how the author Brandon is uninformed that the parking will be lost due to expanding the sidewalks to meet ADA compliance.

So either you care about functioning sidewalks or storage for private vehicles in the public right-of-way.

Don Jones
Don Jones
4 hours ago

I see former Councilmember John D’Amico is up to his tired old stir the anti-Heilman pot. Hey John, it’s 2024 and you’re no longer relevant.

Uron
Uron
8 hours ago

Attempting to make parking so difficult will not change car ownership behavior. It will give more reason for residents to move out of Weho. If that happens and they live in rent control apartments, those apartments will immediately go to market rate. So much for Erickson and Hang’s pitch for affordable housing. Also, any apartment with a parking spot along fountain or nearby will jump at a premium.

Erickson and Hang cannot look beyond the moment to actually understand the impact of the silly ideas.

It’s all a political amateur stunt for Erickson and Hang

Jesse Budlong
Jesse Budlong
2 hours ago
Reply to  Uron

No it’s about widenign sidewalks to ADA compliance. Caring more about vehicle parking than people being able to walk down a street is just selfish. Park your car on your private property. Not public!

Last edited 2 hours ago by Jesse Budlong
Jamie Francis
Jamie Francis
14 hours ago

In my view Fountain will be more unsafe with drivers getting more impatient or more insistent to cut through the neighborhood side streets. More than before drivers and pedestrians will be hit by drivers speeding and cutting through side streets as we saw with recent car crash tragedies. It is notoriously dangerous and unpredictable as a resident like myself who walks everywhere. I rely on walking on streets but I am becoming more hesitant with using crosswalks with yield signals since it is not compelling drivers to stop and yield to a pedestrian’s right of way at a cross walk… Read more »

Last edited 14 hours ago by Jamie Francis
Jordan
Jordan
5 hours ago
Reply to  Jamie Francis

I agree that walking in weho can be a dangerous endeavor. Anyone who walks here would agree with us. You complain about scooters and bikes on the sidewalks (I agree this is an issue), but yet you’re somehow against removing them from the sidewalk by giving them a separate lane to travel in. Let’s support solutions to our problems. Also, I’ve had many close calls crossing streets here as a pedestrian. All of my near death experiences have been at marked crosswalks where there are 2 lanes of traffic in each direction. The car closest to me stops to let… Read more »

Last edited 5 hours ago by Jordan
Steve Martin
Steve Martin
17 hours ago

I question your headline describing the debate over Fountain as simply a political football between “rival factions”. It is really a City Council majority aligned with Streets for All and Unite Here vs. the impacted residents. While I am not saying that all residents oppose Fountain, but the vast majority who have learned about the “re-design” are very opposed to it. The headline trivalizes both sides of the controversy which is not fair to either side. I have been around a while and I have never seen a proposal since we implemented Rent Control that impacts the lives of so… Read more »

Jordan
Jordan
15 hours ago
Reply to  Steve Martin

This is an unfair accusation to make. You seek to categorize certain voices in the community as unworthy of being considered because of their opinions. At the city council meeting where the grant was voted on, many local residents, including me, spoke in support of this project and outlined the ways it would improve our lives and make us safer. The only “special interest” I have is that I don’t want my partner to worry for my life every time I wheel my bicycle out of the front door. Maybe given your disposition and stance on this issue the people… Read more »

John
John
18 hours ago

Sounds like a campaign stunt for Nickle . He did the same thing g with the neighborhood watch list.

Steve Martin
Steve Martin
15 hours ago
Reply to  John

John, sorry to disappoint you but George Nickle never had access or control of the Eastside Neighborhood Watch email list or membership list.
Steve Martin, Chair Eastside Neighborhood Watch.

Roger
Roger
18 hours ago

Why doesn’t this article mention that Larry Block, a major opponent of the Fountain Streetscape project, is the publisher of this website? Journalistic malpractice.

(to the mods, if you have any dignity approve this comment)

Jordan
Jordan
19 hours ago

Brandon, you’re missing a key piece of context to this discussion: The bike lanes are irrelevant to the opposition’s stance on this project. I don’t know how hard it is to get this through people’s heads— even without bike lanes, Fountain Avenue will have to have lose parking and a travel lane. At the very least for many sections of the street. Any work done to Fountain will require that the sidewalks be brought up to code and made ADA compliant. Go walk along Fountain, there’s so little extra space currently. To add multiple feet to the sidewalks on each… Read more »

hifi5000
hifi5000
20 hours ago

I hope the city knows what they are getting into if they proceed with this bike-lane plan.Maybe they should consider another way to control traffic.

I say Fountain Ave. needs to be split up,so there will not be the through traffic that belongs on Sunset and Santa Monica Boulevards.Those boulevards were built to handle heavy traffic.Fountain Ave. is not designed that way and can be considered a residential street.Just because traffic is coming from Los Angeles proper,West Hollywood should not have to accept it.

Bri
Bri
22 hours ago

Since when is road safety political? Why is saving lives here a contentious issue? It’s making me realize that we live in a death cult where people prioritize parking spots over lives and public safety, and WeHo community members cannot imagine a better future for ourselves. It’s sad. The local politics is sooo disappointing. George Nickle is running on a single-issue pro-parking platform when we have bigger fish to fry. The pro-parking element itself is inconsistent with other policies he supposedly endorses. On the one hand, he claims to support ADA-compliance and beautification on Fountain, which necessitates reducing traffic and… Read more »

WeHo is the Best Ho
WeHo is the Best Ho
22 hours ago

John Erickson failed to inform the Police and Fire that he’s already approved plans to make this street unusable for emergency vehicles.
Another tragic accident on Fountain this week… How will fire trucks and ambulances get to emergencies if the streets are clogged???
Way to go, John Failickson

Crash
Bri
Bri
19 hours ago

You’re making assertions with literally 0 evidence to support it. Here’s some schooling for you (maybe you fell asleep during Civics?) Well-designed bike lanes can coexist with emergency vehicle routes. For instance, a study in Paris showed that the introduction of bike lanes led to faster response times for firefighters [source]. A study published in Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives found no significant difference in emergency response times after implementing safer street designs, including bike lanes, in Cedar Rapids, Iowa [source]. Narrowing streets through bike lanes can actually facilitate quicker passage for emergency vehicles. On multi-lane roads, drivers may be uncertain about yielding to… Read more »

WeHo is the Best Ho
WeHo is the Best Ho
4 hours ago
Reply to  Bri

Oh hi Bri,

This is a blog, not a college thesis. But since you’re such wealth of information, drop us a link to where the city council presented information to the public with an evaluation of emergency response times ON FOUNTAIN AVENUE – NOT IOWA.

Jordan
Jordan
15 hours ago

“Already approved plans” – there have been no actual plans submitted for review. Why not wait until the city planners design something before making assumptions? In every meeting they showed single block drawings that they presented as initial sketches. Emergency vehicle accessibility is something they will obviously take into account as they work on a design for an improved Fountain Ave. they’re not reinventing the wheel. Bike infrastructure is common in many cities and there are established best practices for designing and engineering with these issues in mind.

WeHo is the Best Ho
WeHo is the Best Ho
4 hours ago
Reply to  Jordan

Bike lanes are great, but not on Fountain. I have lived on fountain for 8 years and I do not want bike lanes – nobody in my neighborhood does. Doesn’t the resident opinion count???
Or just the opinion of a well-funded bike mob who paid off Erickson to slip this by the people.
On August 21st, 2023 the city council approved installation of bike lanes on Fountain. PERIOD.

Last edited 4 hours ago by WeHo is the Best Ho
Jordan
Jordan
2 hours ago

“Nobody in my neighborhood does” ? I live in your neighborhood and want bike lanes on Fountain. My existence alone shows that your argument is misleading. But it’s not just me. If you look at the city’s own survey of local residents (on https://engage.weho.org/fountain, then click feasibility study and scroll to the very bottom), you’ll see that most residents actually very much want bike lanes, and listed them as a much higher priority than street parking. I don’t doubt that some of our neighbors are against bike lanes, and they are very vocal about it, but on the whole our… Read more »

JCB
JCB
2 hours ago

Cars kill 46,000 people a year but bike lanes are what’s wrong? LOL

Bri
Bri
1 hour ago

LMAO you honestly think there’s a “Big Bicycle” cabal that is out to get your parking? Be for real. There is NOT “big money” in bicycles and bike lanes. There’s much more money in the car industry, including how historically car companies like GM bought out all of the public transit infrastructure in LA and shut it down to make us more car-dependent (click for more info). Also it’s not true that NOBODY in your neighborhood supports bike lanes, several people who live on Fountain Ave. showed up to the council meeting last month to voice their support for bike… Read more »

SeeMe
SeeMe
23 hours ago

There’s no doubt that something needs to be done to improve Fountain. That being said, the underhanded and completely unethical way the City Council went about this without community input has created this battle. In addition to how it might impact emergency vehicles, what about garbage day? How does the city plan on managing traffic flow by keeping both drivers and garbage men safe? Speaking of safety, I know Erickson thinks West Hollywood is perfect safe, but when 150 parking spaces are removed and residents need to walk blocks at night to their homes who will be protecting them? It… Read more »

Bri
Bri
19 hours ago
Reply to  SeeMe

Any changes to improve Fountain will involve the loss of parking and traffic lanes. This is because the sidewalks are not ADA compliant. As soon as they break ground, the city WILL have to make the sidewalks ADA compliant. Your parking is getting removed no matter what, even without bike lanes. Agree that traffic enforcement is a huge gap and the city needs to do more. Not just with cops, but with red light and speed cameras. There are other safety-by-design measures that the city can take, including removing a lane of traffic to force cars to go slower, but… Read more »