“Just Because You Can Doesn’t Mean You Should”: West Hollywood Approves Its First Builder’s Remedy Project

West Hollywood’s Planning Commission voted 6-0 Thursday night to approve the city’s first Builder’s Remedy housing project. Vice Chair Stacy Jones was absent.

Every commissioner who spoke said some version of the same thing before casting a vote: hands tied, state law compels it, yes. What united them wasn’t support for the project. It was a shared acknowledgment that their vote was a foregone conclusion and that the four Builder’s Remedy applications lined up behind this one will be too. 

“Just because you can doesn’t mean you should,” said Planning Commissioner Lynn Hoopingarner.  “I will hold my nose and I will have to vote for this project.”

In case you’re wondering, a Builder’s Remedy is California’s way of punishing cities that don’t plan for enough housing. Every city is required to have a state-approved housing plan — called a Housing Element — showing how it intends to accommodate its share of regional growth. If the state hasn’t certified that plan as compliant, developers can invoke Builder’s Remedy to bypass local zoning entirely. Height limits, density caps, setback rules, none of it applies. The City can still require some design standards, but it can’t say no. West Hollywood’s Housing Element wasn’t in compliance when the 833 Westbourne application came in back in 2023. That’s what put a 68-foot building in a 25-foot zone.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

833 Westborne Drive | Before / After

The project at 833 Westbourne Drive is a 68-foot, six-story, 25-unit apartment building in the middle of a residential street zoned for two stories and 25 feet. The applicant is Benjamin Soleimani’s company, 833 Westbourne Drive LLC. The vote was on Draft Resolution PC 26-1641. Appeals are due to the City Clerk’s office by Monday, May 18 at 5 p.m.

Soleimani is known in West Hollywood’s design circles. He owns the block of Melrose Avenue real estate where Restoration Hardware is located, along with numerous other parcels throughout the City, and is the owner of MANSOUR Rugs on that same block. During public comment, resident Robert Steloff told the commission that Soleimani had privately said he didn’t want to be publicly linked to the project. 

“He did not want his name mentioned because of the embarrassment of this project,” Steloff said.

Hoopingarner opened her deliberation by pushing back on the premise of the whole evening. The City’s own vacancy rates, she said, tell a different story than the one staff was presenting.

“Staff’s assertion that we have a housing crisis is not supported by our 11 to 15% vacancy rates,” Hoopingarner said. “Once again, yes, we have an affordable housing crisis. We do not have a luxury housing crisis.” 

She was looking at a luxury apartment building. Her indictment of it flowed from one central observation. Usually, she said, developers and architects come before the commission proud of what they’ve designed.

“Usually, we have applicants come up here, the architect comes up, they are proud of what they have done. They are proud to show it off. We have to cut them off because they are busy sharing the beauty of their project, and how proud they are of it. We didn’t hear one word about this project,” Hoopingarner said.

“The fact that the applicant did not elect to share with us their project during their entire 10-minute presentation, but rather chose to lecture us about state law, for the entire 10 minutes, says all that we need to know about this project,” Hoopingarner said.

A second issue bugged multiple commissioners in. Concession No. 2 allowed all four affordable units to be clustered on the building’s bottom lowest floors rather than distributed throughout the building as code requires. Hoopingarner called it “the de facto creation of poor floors.” Commissioner Andrew Solomon said the City had no evidence to rebut the legal presumption that clustering saves money, which means every future Builder’s Remedy applicant will use the same move. Commissioner Jesi Harris said it added up to logical acrobatics. “There’s a bit of logical acrobatics in taking an exception from a standard that guides an exception in the first place,” Harris said.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Associate Planner Laurie Yelton confirmed the units must use consistent materials and finishes per the conditions of approval, but couldn’t clearly explain how clustering alone generates the claimed cost savings if design parity is required.

Two residents submitted written comments ahead of the meeting. Tri-West property and business owner Robert Steloff, who first raised the alarm about the project in March, called it the first of five Builder’s Remedy applications headed for his neighborhood.

“Without an enacted Ordinance for Objective Design Standards, the City is essentially inviting developers to ignore our neighborhood’s identity in favor of ‘monolithic stacked shoeboxes,'” Steloff said.

Center City resident Victor Omelczenko disputed the staff report’s characterization that no public comments had been received, saying he testified and submitted a memo at the March 26 Design Review Subcommittee meeting. He also said the May 29 deadline was manufactured, pointing to City quarterly reports showing environmental review was quietly dropped from the project timeline while the developer waited for a new CEQA exemption to take effect.

“They didn’t ‘streamline’ the process; they ‘slow-walked’ it for a year until they could claim a Statutory Exemption from CEQA,” Omelczenko said. “This is a deliberate avoidance of public scrutiny.”

The story ends where it started — with Hoopingarner. When deliberations opened, she had the floor. She used every inch of it:

“I guess I’m gonna begin with just because you can doesn’t mean you should. First of all, Staff’s assertion that we have a housing crisis is not supported by our 11 to 15% vacancy rates. Once again, yes, we have an affordable housing crisis. But we do not have a luxury housing crisis. To that end, in fact, it is very sad that this six-story building is only going to provide one new affordable housing unit. One. Three existing residents have lost their home and most likely aren’t coming back because they were Ellised. And we’re only gonna get one new affordable housing unit.

“The fact that the applicant did not elect to share with us their project during their entire 10-minute presentation, but rather chose to lecture us about state law, for the entire 10 minutes, says all that we need to know about this project. Usually, we have applicants come up here, the architect comes up, they are proud of what they have done. They are proud to show it off. We have to cut them off because they are busy sharing the beauty of their project, and how proud they are of it. We didn’t hear one word about this project. It’s interesting to hear from the public that Mr. Soleimani doesn’t want to be associated with this project, and I’m confused because his name is all over the documents submitted as the owner of this project. And it’s my understanding that he’s a rather well-known designer… I’ve not seen a great deal of his work, but one would think that someone doing high-end luxury design work would want to be proud of a project and how it’s going to reflect on their reputation as a designer.

“Staff’s urban design analysis dams this with faint praise. It is, quote, characterized by rectilinear massing. Let me interpret that. That’s a big square box. With a, quote, limited material palette — it’s boring and unremarkable. With a, quote, base, middle, and top composition — it has a bunch of stories. It goes on to basically say it’s a building. This is a longtime business owner in our city who, one would think, would want a thriving, attractive city that attracts people to our community and to his businesses. So what he’s hanging his hat on here is, frankly, baffling to me.

“Parking. Once again, we’re looking at a project that’s only parking 20% of their 30 bedrooms. For another luxury building. Let’s not kid ourselves — this is going to be luxury housing. I’m not sure what you’ve got in your pro formas for rent. But if you think you’re going to rent a 6th-story, luxury, two-bedroom apartment for somewhere between $8,000 and $10,000 and not give them parking, I think you’re, frankly, delusional in this town.

“As for the concessions and the waivers, I am frankly disappointed that the City made no effort to gather information about how having these affordable units — not evenly distributed, but stuck on the bottom floors, without any design configuration changes whatsoever in the floor plans — the only way they’re going to save money is in lower quality materials. And that’s the only way they could get a cost-savings concession, which is what concessions are about. And I find that very unfortunate, that we are forced to prove the case, and we have no data.

“As for the waivers: an 83% reduction in private open space. Dinky balconies that you cannot even put a café table and two chairs on. Those balconies are useless. A 66% reduction in front setbacks. A 44% decrease in side yard setbacks. A 174% increase in height over what is otherwise permitted. No canopy trees — after destroying a minimum of three, and most likely four, existing mature trees. The volume of carbon that one mature tree takes out of our community. The heat island effect it reduces. The rainwater runoff a mature tree handles. And we are once again losing an entire lot full of them. And yes, it’s a taking.

“All of those reductions in setbacks is a taking from the neighborhood buildings. All of those shades and shadows are takings from neighborhood buildings. They’re taking away the parking from the neighborhood. It takes away the trees and the air quality and the water runoff and the heat island.

“I will hold my nose, and I will have to vote for this project. Those are my comments,”

Lynn Hoopingarner calls it like she sees it and says what needs saying. No hedging. No ceremony. No soft landing.

Miranda Priestly would recognize the type…“That’s all.

Related Coverage

Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly described Benjamin Soleimani’s connection to Restoration Hardware. He owns the Melrose Avenue block where RH is located. A rug collection for RH was the work of his brother Ben Soleimani, who is not involved in the 833 Westbourne project.

3 2 votes
Article Rating

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

33 Comments
Newest
Oldest
James
James
1 month ago

Really glad that state law forced anti-housing governments like Weho to allow people to build more housing. More supply decreases rents. Rents in Weho are absolutely insane. Weho used to be a refuge for queer kids fleeing abuse across the country — if we can build enough housing, that can happen again.

sean
sean
1 month ago

as someone that lives in this neighborhood, I honestly am not mad we are densifying, it was bound to happen. However, I am concerned about the parking situation, and I do agree that it seems silly they think they can rent for top rates without parking when there are hundreds of other luxury apartments with parking. Also wish we had more dense zoning in this area. It should be a 4/5 story area, given where it is situated between very dense commercial streets. Also I do think the city should look into some sort of ordinance (unless we have) that… Read more »

A:D
1 month ago
Reply to  sean

The affordable housing idea you have is excellent. Parking should be mandatory, especially electric charging parking. In all honesty, who earns 3 times the rent when the rent is $8000-$10,000? The renter needs to earn $360,000 annually. I bet we have more minimum wage jobs than high-paying jobs in a 10-mile radius. We need housing for our retail, restaurant, and hotel employees. If weHo thinks people are willing to take public transportation or ride their bike, they are simply ignoring the logistics of our community.

Steve Zlick
Steve Zlick
1 month ago

I’m not sure why everyone on the Planning Commission voted in favor and against their ideals; it’s illegal only for the City Council to vote against it, as I understand it. Oh well, this ugly big box building is going up across the street from me. It’s going to make the neighborhood worse, but I think it’s merely a harbinger of what’s to come all over WeHo as standards are obliterated because the subway may arrive here decades from now. If WeHo becomes appreciably more urban, we may sell our lot for millions of dollars to someone who will add… Read more »

Jay
Jay
1 month ago
Reply to  Steve Zlick

Hi Steve-

Good question. I trust Lynn Hoopingarner to always do the right thing, so if she feels compelled to vote against her principles, there must be a valid reason, as opposed to, I don’t know, Andrew Solomon.

As things stand currently, your crystal ball looks sadly accurate to me.

Hope this election cycle brings resident-centered change agents to overcome sellouts Erickson and Hang’s votes until they (not soon enough) get the boot.

Steve Zlick
Steve Zlick
1 month ago
Reply to  Jay

But at least it was cute as she literally held her nose as she voted in favor of the thing she had just railed against.

Todd
Todd
1 month ago

This sounds like Ben Soleimani needs to be boycotted. The city does have options that have already been put into place by other cities

Stephanie Harker
Stephanie Harker
1 month ago

I’d like to know…where is the RESIDENTS’ Remedy?

Jay
Jay
1 month ago

Stephanie- The Residents’ Remedy is to vote the Unite Here stooges, Byers, Erickson, and Hang, out asap, starting with Byers in the current election cycle. Ask me about the time she gave the hand to an elderly resident who tried to engage her about the Fountain Avenue road and parking diet. The catalyst is residents like you and many more regularly speaking truth to power. Sadly, we are losing Lauren Meister and John Heilman, the two adults in the room, to term limits this cycle. The physical form of the Residents’ Remedy? I was going to say an eight storey… Read more »

West Hollywood used to be a nice place to live
West Hollywood used to be a nice place to live
1 month ago
Reply to  Jay

Amen. 👍

West Hollywood used to be a nice place to live
West Hollywood used to be a nice place to live
1 month ago

👍❤️

Tommatchthecase
Tommatchthecase
1 month ago

What WeHo needs to do is what BH is doing: they can build them with no parking but in choosing to do so they aren’t being allowed to receive permit parking.

Jay
Jay
1 month ago

If I am not mistaken, that is already the case in West Hollywood as well. Unfortunately in at least one recent case, the powers that be granted a variance to a developer of an over scale, under-parked project. Why even have the regulation in the first place then, and what a great message to send to every other greedy developer!

Phillip
1 month ago

Why was the city not in compliance in 2023 is my question? How could they be so disorganized?

Alan Strasburg
Alan Strasburg
1 month ago
Reply to  Phillip

Was it disorganization, or an intentional failure to be in compliance that allowed Builder’s Remedy to take over local control? If the former, bureaucratic heads should roll, and if the latter it’s a scandal of epic proportions that needs to be brought to light. Once again, follow the money. Who is benefiting from the city’s failure to be in compliance?

Stephanie Harker
Stephanie Harker
1 month ago
Reply to  Phillip

Or was the City PURPOSELY late because that favored developers?

NottaNimby
NottaNimby
1 month ago

What a wild and crazy thing for you to say. Maybe you should ask your nimby buddy, Ms. Meister, why she consistently refused to approve the Housing Element. Had she approved it the first time, the City could have sent it to HUD for approval, and therefore wouldn’t have been in this situation for builder remedy projects to be submitted. Stop blaming the wrong people—It’s not a good look on you.

Kody Christiansen
1 month ago

Lynn is absolutely right. We have an affordable housing crisis, but definitely NOT a luxury housing crisis. West Hollywood does not need more expensive units that sit empty or are simply out of reach for the people who actually work here and keep this city going. We need housing that retail workers, hospitality workers, artists, young people, and longtime residents can realistically afford. As someone who came to West Hollywood looking for safety, freedom, and a chance to build a life so many years ago, I care about this deeply. I worry that the kind of sanctuary I found here… Read more »

A:D
1 month ago

BINGO! I made the same point in my comment above. I am a local artist and have lived here for 17 years. I was a single mother and could barely get by, but this has become my home, and trust me, moving at this stage in my life would be so difficult. My neighbors’ building just sold for 3 million bucks, and they will all be moving, to their dismay. I’d love to think City Council is looking out for us, but maybe not. According to Apartments.com, there are currently 4,631 vacancies in WeHo. There has been a significant decline in… Read more »

Fedupwithwehogovernment
Fedupwithwehogovernment
1 month ago

The Weho government is destroying the value of living in West Hollywood. As everyone has stated, none of these apartments are going to be affordable. And they are not going to have parking? Oh right, the immediate future of Weho and LA overall is that everyone will take public transportation. Bullshit. There is not a shortage of housing in Weho given the vacancy rates. But between our council’s screw up on builder’s remedy and the most recent CA legislation that more six-story buildings can be built on a 6000 sq fr lot – given possible future subway stops – these… Read more »

ERICKSON, BYERS AND HANG ARE A CANCER TO WEHO
ERICKSON, BYERS AND HANG ARE A CANCER TO WEHO
1 month ago

John Erickson, Chelsea Byers and Danny Hang are a cancer to West Hollywood. They use the same tactics as Trump, bullying, profiting from developers, ignoring residents etc to impose their Marxist policies disguised as “progressive”. The only progress they care for is their own, just look at Erickson’s clownish attempt to leave WeHo for a California seat. These council members don’t give a rat’s ass about affordable housing, all they care for is to allow developers to build luxury apartments so, in return, developers fund their political campaigns. It’s sickening that residents need to use legal actions to stop them… Read more »

Fedupwithwehogovernment
Fedupwithwehogovernment
1 month ago

100%

Jay
Jay
1 month ago

Bless Lynn Hoopingarner for as usual, eloquently speaking truth to power. Ben Soleimani is right to be ashamed. Credit to Robert Steloff and Victor Omelczenko for speaking up as well. Per Steloff, an enacted Ordinance for Objective Design Standards would be helpful. This should be a priority, along with addressing the loophole creation of ‘poor floors’. Ideally evidence can be found to rebut developers claims of cluster cost savings. And like Lynn, I have long publicly questioned who is this mythical tenant ready to spend $5K and up for rent with no parking. Additionally, unless a variance was incomprehensibly granted… Read more »

Kody Christiansen
1 month ago
Reply to  Jay

Exactly! I don’t know anyone who works in WeHo who has $5k for a 1-bedroom. (They exist, sure… but they aren’t the people who work at the local cake shop on SMB or at the hotels on Sunset.)

Thank you, Lynn, Robert, and Victor … and ALL the residents who consistently and proudly speak up for the residents. It is inspiring.

Jay
Jay
1 month ago

Kody-

I’m so glad you found your ‘logical family’ in West Hollywood. I am proud to call you neighbor!

Re your suggestion in a different comment above, to facilitate the conversion of commercial real estate to dwellings, which I fully support, a vacancy tax assessed on commercial landlords might push more property owners to consider that option.

NoToBuildersRemedy
NoToBuildersRemedy
1 month ago

West Hollywood never should have been out of compliance. And as a reminder, the reason the City was out of compliance was political posturing.This is the exact type of situation that leads to the rise of people like Spencer Pratt, Chad Bianco and Steve Hilton. Citizens become angry and feel like they have no say in the situations that impact them directly and next thing you know, the messaging of the demagogue takes hold. Additionally, there is a lack of transparency and self-regulation within West Hollywood’s government. In this instance, Andrew Solomon should have recused himself as he made many… Read more »

Last edited 1 month ago by NoToBuildersRemedy
Jay
Jay
1 month ago

A pox on Andrew Solomon. He is the John Erickson of the Planning Commission.

Alan Strasburg
Alan Strasburg
1 month ago

Until yesterday, Andrew Solomon was identified on John Erickson’s campaign endorsement web page as “Building WeHo Co-Founder”. Building WeHo is identified online as “a housing advocacy initiative, often associated with Abundant Housing LA, focused on promoting more housing development and community-driven solutions to make West Hollywood a more accessable and inclusive place to live. It acts as a community-oriented voice for increased housing production in the city.” That identity has now been changed to “West Hollywood Planning Commissioner” but I have the screen shot of the Building WeHo notation. I complained to the city attorney who advised me that Solomon… Read more »

Mike
Mike
1 month ago
Reply to  Alan Strasburg

Simply cannot wait for Solomon’s next diatribe on “Housing Filtering”.

WeHo Pete
WeHo Pete
1 month ago
Reply to  Mike

Solomon sells himself as “the change that West Hollywood needs”. He openly wants to convert the city from gay to traditional families and has strongly argued to build more schools for his kid to go to.

Last edited 1 month ago by WeHo Pete