WeHo’s LGBTQ+Advisory Board yanks support for Drag Laureate Program

ADVERTISEMENT

The board and WeHo’s Chamber of Commerce think the Drag Laureate should be paid thousands more than what’s budgeted

WeHo’s LGBTQ+ Advisory Board has publicly denounced City Hall for not paying their yet-to-be-selected Drag Laureate enough.

Similar to a poet laureate, the drag laureate is a yearlong paid position awarded to a local drag performer to serve as the “official ambassador of West Hollywood’s LGBTQ community and nightlife.” City Council had approved a stipend of $5,000 to be paid to the honoree. That’s $2,000 more than the city’s Poet Laureate receives.

But in coordination with the WeHo Chamber, the LGBTQ+ Advisory Board is calling out the “pay inequity” they see in the program, alleging that it “perpetuates the tokenizing, objectification, and the delegitimization of drag performance as enterprise.”

WeHo would have been the first in the nation to have a Drag Laureate program, but delays last fall allowed San Francisco to swoop in and steal the distinction. The Golden Gate City pays their Drag Laureate an honorarium of $55,000 per year, and the LGBTQ+ Advisory Board thinks WeHo should be paying a comparable figure.

WeHo’s Drag Laureate would be required to attend 10 ribbon-cuttings for new businesses and other official city gatherings. San Francisco’s Drag Laureate seems to have a much heftier workload, including delivering an inaugural event, serving as an ambassador, and producing “drag-centered events and programming centered on celebrating and supporting San Francisco’s dynamic and diverse LGBTQI+ community.”

According to the memo, the Chamber persuaded City Hall in September to begin the process of raising the Drag Laureate’s pay from $5,000 to $12,500 per year and to put the application process on hold until the raise was approved, but city staff failed to adhere to the bargain. The application remained online and several performers applied.

ADVERTISEMENT

Board Co-Chair Miss Tiger was unaware that the Chamber had negotiated a pay raise with City Hall, and she disputed previously published reports that the City Hall had recently offered an even larger increase.

Councilmember Lauren Meister says she and the program’s planners at City Hall were surprised by the push back from the board. She said they had surveyed local clubs and come up with a pay rate that was higher than what most drag performers were being paid for comparable work. Now, they’re looking at what other cities are paying, and an item to review the program will return to City Council soon.

Boardmember Renee Sotile, who voted against sending the memo to City Council, sees the board’s rejection of the program as a missed opportunity to reward an aspiring role model with a chance of a lifetime.

“San Francisco is California’s fourth-largest city. It has more than 1 million residents compared to our 30,000,” Sotile said. “It’s not a fair comparison considering the time commitments and work requirements.”

The memo is as follows:

The West Hollywood Chamber of Commerce stands in solidarity with the City’s own LGBTQ+ Advisory Board in voicing our concern regarding fair and equitable compensation for the Drag Laureate Program. Pay inequity for the laureate perpetuates the tokenizing, objectification, and the delegitimization of drag performance as enterprise.

So strong is our position on promoting a vibrant, diverse, and inclusive field of small business in West Hollywood, the Chamber advised Mayor Meister and Director of Economic Development, John Leonard, that we would pull our support and involvement for this program unless the pay equity issue was resolved because the Chamber cannot reconcile advocating and coaching the Drag Laureate to recognize themselves as a legitimate business, while the program itself perpetuates an exploitative gaze that benefits from drag performance remaining part of an informal economy, especially of an already marginalized community.

We were heartened when our efforts to renegotiate the stipend from $5,000 to $12,500 per year proved successful when, on Sep 29th, Mayor Meister instructed John Leonard to pull the program from the website until the item could be brought back to Council in November because we were excited to be part of this inaugural program that we believed held so much progress.

We appreciated Mayor Meister’s willingness to hear our concerns and her commitment to fair compensation. We are deeply disappointed that the program remained online, despite the promise to pull it until the compensation increase was resolved and despite four attempts by the Chamber (since Oct 4) to inquire about the fact that it was still up on the City’s website. So now, rather than voicing simple concern, we must voice our outright objection to the program as it is currently written and approved.

The Chamber and the West Hollywood Small Business Foundation will not support or participate in the City’s Drag Laureate Program. This means that we will not take part in reviewing applicants or making recommendations on who should be laureate. Furthermore, we will not consent to any Chamber events being used as part of the Drag Laureate’s required duties and we request any reference to a partnership with the City be stricken from the program immediately. While the Chamber is still moving forward with creating the Independent Entertainer Program, as this was always in our scope of work; it just won’t be in collaboration with laureate program.

If a laureate wishes to join the Chamber, complimentary for the first year, under our new entertainer membership plan, they are welcome to inquire with us directly; however, it must be clearly stated that it will be separate from the official City’s Drag Laureate Program.

THE HISTORY OF THE ‘LAUREATE’

A laureate is a person who has been honored with a prestigious award or prize for their outstanding achievements in a particular field or discipline. The term “laureate” is often associated with a crown or wreath of laurel leaves, which was a symbol of victory and achievement in ancient Greece and Rome.

Laureates are typically recognized for their exceptional contributions to their field, such as scientific discovery, artistic expression, humanitarian efforts, or public service. The award may come with a financial prize, recognition, and prestige, and can serve as a recognition of the recipient’s lifetime of work or a specific, exceptional accomplishment.

There are many different types of laureates in various fields, including the Nobel Prize laureates in physics, chemistry, medicine, literature, and peace, Fields Medal laureates in mathematics, Turing Award laureates in computer science, MacArthur Fellows, and Pulitzer Prize winners, among others.

The history of poet laureates dates back to the 17th century in England. The position of Poet Laureate was created in 1668 as a way to recognize and reward poets for their contributions to English literature. The first Poet Laureate was John Dryden, who was appointed by King Charles II.

Since then, the tradition of appointing a Poet Laureate has spread to other countries, including the United States, where the Library of Congress has had a Poet Laureate Consultant in Poetry since 1937. The role of the Poet Laureate varies depending on the country and the specific institution, but in general, the Poet Laureate serves as a representative of the literary community and is expected to promote poetry and the arts.

In some countries, the Poet Laureate is also expected to write poems for special occasions, such as royal births, weddings, and state funerals. In other countries, the Poet Laureate is free to write whatever they choose and may use the position to raise awareness about social or political issues.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
ADVERTISEMENT

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

36 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dispiriting
Dispiriting
1 year ago

How about the city advocate CERT training rather than glorifying this inane issue. A Drag Laureate is not likely to save your life in an earthquake. The time spent in this meeting would have benefitted exponentially had it been focused on safety.

Reading Rainbow
Reading Rainbow
1 year ago

What about leather bear daddies, twinks and muscle jocks? What do they get?

MG Havenhurst Drive
MG Havenhurst Drive
1 year ago

Gay men get absolutely nothing in WEHO. It used to be boys town. But with that dreadful man hating Shyne orchestrating the drag worshipping Act along with Erickson. No room for men Gay or straight In West Hollywood. Just the new Weho freak show. With the lunatic fringe tranny anti urinal coalition being worship like the second coming! Also, headed by Shyne!

WeHo Mary!
WeHo Mary!
1 year ago

I’m sure I’ve said it before here, the death knell was the Ed Buck situation and everything with Duran. This represented how the community of gay men was out of control and betrayed the rest of the community. Then, bloggers, writers, activists and the media stirred the pot hard, and here we are.

Jose
Jose
1 year ago

Not micro enough…you need to be less than 0.0001 of the GAY pop with 10 letters behind your “code”.

Jose
Jose
1 year ago

How about we spend that money on an ADULT that actually takes into consideration how taxpayers want their money spent? I would venture to say the majority of WH taxpayers find this incredibly trashy, immature and another micro niche minority wantonly wasting OUR tax dollars.

Ham Shipey
Ham Shipey
1 year ago
Reply to  Jose

yep

Steve Martin
Steve Martin
1 year ago

The Chamber of Commerce stands in solidarity with our Drag Laureate; but not with our City’s Hotel workers.

BrownEyedBoy
BrownEyedBoy
1 year ago
Reply to  Steve Martin

Steve you’re just stirring to pot–not a fair comparison. The hotel workers receive financial support from their corporate employers as well as great support from the powerful Unite Here11 union who now decides who gets elected & who doesn’t (you know that). The Drag Laureate was supposed to be a fun, promotional position to celebrate the City. But no…this board had to blow it up to something negative and controversial as they are better navigating petty grievances than big, complex social issues.

Steve Martin
Steve Martin
1 year ago
Reply to  BrownEyedBoy

I am just trying to point out the absurdity of the whole thing.

Jason
Jason
1 year ago

Can you please spend my tax dollars on earthquake retrofitting or keeping the sidewalks cleaner instead of this idiocy? Drag queens are not some magical totemic object that represent gay men–they’re a frivolous attraction mainly for straight girls. The way the “LGBTQ movement” has grabbed onto cross dressers as a cause on par with gay marriage is absolutely pathetic.

Jose
Jose
1 year ago
Reply to  Jason

WORD!

Jim Nasium
Jim Nasium
1 year ago

The city’s Poet Laureate is calling his agent.

voting
voting
1 year ago

I don’t support having a West Hollywood drag laureate at any cost. That’s not how I want the city to be represented, and it’s a terrible waste of public funds. We are severely overtaxed if there’s money for this type of frivolity.

Ham Shipey
Ham Shipey
1 year ago
Reply to  voting

bingo. there’s a huge backlash brewing because of all this nonsense.

Jose
Jose
1 year ago
Reply to  voting

It is absurdity at its best. WH is too dangerous to walk at night and these immature morons are spending money on GD Drag Queens!

Alan Strasburg
Alan Strasburg
1 year ago

What started as a good idea and a fun thing for all has devolved into yet another shit-show of yellers and screamers who will manipulate the facts and call anyone who dares ask a question a right-wing bigot. In my world, $5,000 to do a handful of ribbon-cutting events throughout the year is a mighty fine level of compensation. Further, comparing San Francisco’s program to the proposed West Hollywood program is a fool’s folly. San Francisco is a major metropolitan city. Sadly, West Hollywood continues to let shine the provincial minds of provincial thinkers. If our region wants a program pari passu with San Francisco,… Read more »

WeHo Mary!
WeHo Mary!
1 year ago
Reply to  Alan Strasburg

Sometimes I feel like it’s the goal of many to create all of the these types of positions so that no one has to actually work. I’ve never been in a city where so many people have income, but I can’t figure out what they actually do for a living to receive said income.

BrownEyedBoy
BrownEyedBoy
1 year ago

Talk about drag–it is sad to see how these boards and commissions are dragging the City of West Hollywood into the depths of dumbness through these manufactured crises.

If the city’s boards and commissions aren’t going to participate in actual governance, they should be dissolved.

Jose
Jose
1 year ago
Reply to  BrownEyedBoy

It is truly pathetic.

Jeff
Jeff
1 year ago

I was talking about this program with an older gay neighbor, he dismissed the idea and said “drag queens are for my community what ska bands are for straight people, there’s one or two good acts and the rest are total crap” and it may have been the funniest thing I’ve heard this year.

Alan Strasburg
Alan Strasburg
1 year ago

What started as a good idea and a fun thing for all has devolved into yet another shit-show of yellers and screamers who will manipulate the facts and call anyone who dares ask a question a right-wing bigot. In my world, $5,000 to do a handful of ribbon-cutting events throughout the year is a mighty fine level of compensation. Further, comparing San Francisco’s program to the proposed West Hollywood program is a fool’s folly. San Francisco is a major metropolitan city. Sadly, West Hollywood continues to let shine the provincial minds of provincial thinkers. If our region wants a program… Read more »

Robert Switzer
Robert Switzer
1 year ago

The article would have been more helpful had it actually explained the reason for the advisory committee’s withdrawal of support.

More $$$$$🤣
More $$$$$🤣
1 year ago
Reply to  Robert Switzer

More $$, More$$$, More $$$&