OPINION: The corruption infesting West Hollywood

West Hollywood is a vibrant and welcoming city—a place I’ve proudly called home since 2013. Much of its success as a progressive bastion has been attributed to the leadership at City Hall, which has long been seen as a model of transparency and good governance. However, these values are now at serious risk, and the threat comes from none other than the individual entrusted with preserving them: Mayor John Erickson.

The weeks leading up to an election are a crucial time—not just for engaging voters, but for fundraising. Many businesses, organizations, and individuals contribute to political campaigns because, even in a democracy, money talks. Recently, I spoke with someone who has ongoing business interests in the city. For their protection, I won’t name this individual, but they have a long history of contributing to various candidates across multiple election cycles. This person recounted a troubling conversation with John Erickson, who warned them, “I wouldn’t think you’d be unwise enough to contribute to Jordan Cockeram.” This veiled threat carried a clear message: support one of Erickson’s opponents, and you can expect your projects to be voted down.

This isn’t an isolated incident, nor is it merely a reflection of political competitiveness—it’s a dangerous abuse of power. Erickson’s influence currently rests on a narrow 3-2 majority on the City Council. With Council member Sepi Shyne stepping down after her defeat in the 30th Congressional District Primary, that majority is threatened. In an effort to maintain his control, Erickson has not only sought endorsements for himself, but has also pressured other officials, suggesting they refrain from endorsing candidates who might challenge his grip on power.

Such tactics are not just ethically questionable; they betray the trust placed in our city’s leaders. Erickson’s actions reveal a leader whose first priority is his own political future, not the well-being of West Hollywood. His use of intimidation and coercion reflects a stark departure from the values of openness and fairness that have long defined our city’s government. At the end of the day, Erickson cares about one thing: preserving his own power. Is this the kind of leadership we want? Is this the kind of government West Hollywood deserves? To that, I say nay.

Adding insult to injury, Erickson’s ambitions extend far beyond West Hollywood. He is already laying the groundwork for his campaign for California’s State Senate District 24, prioritizing his own political advancement, not to mention his ego, over the responsibilities of his current office. Should he win this November, he will spend the bulk of his term campaigning for higher office, leaving West Hollywood taxpayers to foot the bill for a costly special election to replace him. Once again, it will be the residents of West Hollywood paying the price for his ambition.

To John Erickson, West Hollywood is little more than a stepping stone—a convenient launchpad for his personal aspirations. When the results are in, Erickson won’t be here to serve this city; he’ll be campaigning for State Senate, absent when we need him most. And who will cover the costs of his departure? You will. Re-electing him this November would be a grave mistake.

I hope to earn your trust and one of your two votes in this upcoming election. I’m running to represent you—the people of West Hollywood—because I believe in this city and its future, not because I’m beholden to special interests or willing to sacrifice our community for personal gain. Let’s return West Hollywood to the people who live here, not those who would sell it out.

For more information or to share your concerns, please visit my website at JordanForWeho.com or reach out directly at JC@JordanForWeHo.com, or (323) 252-0992.