City Council Approves $12 Million Increase in Funding for West Hollywood Park Redevelopment

ADVERTISEMENT
The grand staircase leading into the aquatic and recreation center at the new West Hollywood Park (Illustration by LPA Architects)

The West Hollywood City Council last night approved a $12 million increase in the budget for the renovation of West Hollywood Park, which will bring the total cost of the second stage of the renovation to $113.5 million.

With the inclusion of phase one of the renovation, which included construction of the West Hollywood Library, the City Council Chambers and the five-story parking structure, the city’s overall spending on the eight-acre park is anticipated to be $22.2 million an acre.

City Councilmember Lauren Meister objected to the $2.8 million increase in the city’s contract for construction management services with CBRE Heery Inc.  That 56% increase means the city will be paying CBRE Heery a total of $7.8 million.  Meister was the only council member to vote “no” on that portion of the overall increase.

The second stage of the renovation was initially anticipated to be completed this year.  However, now the final completion is expected in the Spring of 2022.

Mayor John D’Amico suggested that the city consider putting up a barricade around the entire park so that the renovation could move faster.  The city initially had decided to leave as much of the park open to residents while construction was underway on specific parts of the redevelopment.  However, D’Amico noted, the entire park now is closed because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The renovation has drawn criticism from some residents, who have cited expensive aspects such as the $1.75 million “grand stair.”

ADVERTISEMENT
5 1 vote
Article Rating
ADVERTISEMENT

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

20 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Josh
Josh
4 years ago

Some of you are silly, you dont cancel a project that already has 113M sunk into over a 12M budget overrun.

Ham Shipey
Ham Shipey
4 years ago

And in a few weeks…..they will be laying off staff. WH needs a few serious people who don’t only care about parades and pet projects.

Stalwart
Stalwart
4 years ago

What I’ll add to this general discussion is that the meetings about Plummer years ago were not respectful.

Weho resident
Weho resident
4 years ago

This is absolutely ridiculous. The park is beautiful and the library is perfect. They just redid the park not that long ago this doesn’t make any sense what are they laundering money? What other city continually renovates and rebuilds their parks and library? Leave the park and library alone and use that additional $12 million to help fight COVID-19 in the city, give out masks, offer free testing, help local businesses! Build a homeless shelter or an animal shelter do something positive and constructive with the money. It’s time to wake up Weho residence and stop voting for these people… Read more »

Steve Martin
Steve Martin
4 years ago

While I understand the City Council wanted to make a grand, monumental statement, but the staircase is several tons of reflective concrete that does not seem particularly environmentally friendly. But the plans were done over a period of years so you can’t say that the public did not have input on the project. I just hope that the finished product does not have the same sort of imperfects and expensive defects that we experienced with the City Council Chambers.

Vigilant
Vigilant
4 years ago

Will someone kindly call Mr. Adams at Heery Inc. now CBRE Heery Inc. real estate investment and then some, to determine what his contribution to Weho might be after seemingly lifelong career benefits from the city? Then the oversight budget consulting fee for the Rose Bowl. Being connected is nice and then there are those pesky over budget situations..

Good thing Councilmember Meister watches the fine print otherwise the dish might have run away with the spoon.

Larry Block
4 years ago

In our original contract cost overruns up to 10% are expected and built in. Council really had no choice, —-to say no means back to the drawing board. Also if you look at the budget the real cost is not the total cost of the project. The cost is the debt service on the bond issued, and with the cost increase the amount of added debt service is marginal.

HPhyl
HPhyl
4 years ago

The lack of oversight and concern is alarming here. Agree with others who praise Councilmember Meister for her guts. How are entities who repeatedly seem to screw up allowed to get more millions (then more millions. then more millions.)?

The Only Sane One Left
The Only Sane One Left
4 years ago

It’s so easy for a bunch of politicians to sit and say ‘Yes’ to taking and spending other people’s money. But this massive $113.5 Million monolith only costs $3000 per Weho resident. Of course that doesn’t include the annual operating expenses which will also be coming out of someone else’s wallet. Where will those millions come from? Maybe they can sell naming rights!!! Or vote to approve digital billboards on the roof? Wouldn’t it be great if politicians running for office were honest? Like saying “If you vote for me I promise to take $3000 out of your retirement savings… Read more »

Ham Shipey
Ham Shipey
4 years ago

West Hollywood is not a serious city. Perhaps time to move back under the LA umbrella. How much of this nonsense can we take?

Randy
Randy
4 years ago

And this was mostly paid for by NON-WeHo residents. i.e., hotel taxes and sales taxes. People visiting the city on weekends. That’s where the “millions come from.” The money is already there. The city is running at a huge surplus.

If you live in this city, or near it, be grateful that they actually spend money on services that benefit the public. This is just one of many.

That said, I’m not pleased with the cost overruns, or that we have to wait another two years, which I find ridiculous.

Steve Martin
Steve Martin
4 years ago
Reply to  Randy

You have your finger in the right place regarding finances. West Hollywood is very fortunate to have huge revenues from hotel tax and parking tickets, paid primarily by outsiders. But as the City’s coffers have filled any attempt at fiscal responsibility seem tedious to most of the City Council members. We are very fortunate to have the funds to be able to do this sort of renovation for West Hollywood Park but we could be allocating a couple million dollars toward providing guaranteed minimum incomes to the many residents who are in need.

The Only Sane One Left
The Only Sane One Left
4 years ago
Reply to  Steve Martin

Steve, the money grows on outsider’s trees? Government absorption of private disposable income by taxes (and fines) has wide reaching macro-economic effects. I’d suggest you study ‘The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money’ by John Maynard Keynes, one of the foundations of modern economic theory, which you can take out of the Weho library. And you can easily get a copy since there are (sadly) only 2 copies in the entire Los Angeles County Library system but not surprisingly both are available. Why are there are so many Weho residents in need of financial support? It’s all explained in… Read more »

Greg
Greg
4 years ago

It took 1 year and 45 days to build the Empire State Building.
They’ve been working 3+ years and now they need 2 more to build a park!?
And this only accounts for phase II. Where’s the accountability on the timeline?

tad taxpayer
tad taxpayer
4 years ago
Reply to  Greg

darn good question. the more i read about this (including the links Vigilant supplied), the more questions i have. where is the accountaibility at all? and why does the city keep going with this same company? and why do we just get the nonsense about “not wanting to change horses” as a reason?

factsmatter
factsmatter
4 years ago
Reply to  Greg

You forgot about the five dead men it took to finish the Empire State Building.

Ham Shipey
Ham Shipey
4 years ago

Such nonsense.