Update – Wednesday June 3rd — 6:00 p.m.
The LA County Registrar released a new ballot count Wednesday afternoon. Erickson gained ground in the latest tally, climbing to 16.8% with 33,069 votes. Goldsmith held second at 18.7% with 36,768 votes. Marshall remained in first at 20.0% with 39,337 votes. The gap between Erickson and Goldsmith narrowed slightly to 3,699 votes. Meanwhile Republican Kristina Irwin also gained ground, moving to 15.9% with 31,298 votes — now trailing Erickson by fewer than 1,800 votes. The AP revised its estimate to 62% of votes counted. We’ll keep you updated.
Earlier story published – Wednesday June 3rd – 5 a.m
In a bit of a stunner, a Republican is leading the California State Senate District 24 race, topping a ten-candidate field in a district that has trended heavily Democratic for years and setting up what appears to be a Democrat versus Republican November matchup for the second time in four years. Many had expected the runoff to be a contest between two Democrats.
Torrance Republican G. Rick Marshall and Beverly Hills Democrat Brian Goldsmith look likely to advance to the November runoff in the race for California State Senate District 24, according to early returns. Results were partial and uncertified as of early Wednesday. We’ll continue to update results throughout.
According to the California Secretary of State, 60% of the estimated vote has been counted as of 12:30p Wednesday. Marshall led with 20.46% and 37,902 votes. Goldsmith was in second at 18.48% with 34,242 votes. West Hollywood City Councilmember John Erickson, who entered the race with the backing of the full California labor movement, was in third at 16.38% with 30,340 votes — trailing Marshall by more than 7,500. Vote center ballots, cast in person on Election Day, accounted for nearly 30% of all ballots counted — and they seemed to have broken heavily for Marshall, whose South Bay base turned out in force. The race will not be officially certified until July 10.
Goldsmith posted a video to Instagram late Tuesday night. “The early returns are in, and they are encouraging,” Goldsmith said. “We are cautiously optimistic. We seem to be in one of the top two positions, which is the key. Very grateful for all the support from folks across the 24th District. We are gonna keep on monitoring this in the hours and days to come, and we will keep you updated.” WEHOonline reached out to his campaign for further comment.
If the results hold, Erickson’s campaign would mark one of the most heavily labor-backed efforts in the district’s recent history to fall short. His coalition included the full Los Angeles County Federation of Labor AFL-CIO, UNITE HERE Local 11, SEIU California, the California Teachers Association, the California Nurses Association, six AFSCME locals, IBEW Local 18, the Iron Workers, the Carpenters, the Laborers, and the United Auto Workers. Four of the five Los Angeles County supervisors also endorsed him.
November would instead pit a Democrat against a Republican in a district that has trended heavily Democratic for years and sent only Democrats to Sacramento for more than a decade. Many political observers had expected the runoff to be between two Democrats. SD-24 includes West Hollywood, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Malibu, Venice, Brentwood, Bel Air, Hollywood, Miracle Mile, Torrance, Manhattan Beach, Hermosa Beach, Redondo Beach, Palos Verdes Estates, Rancho Palos Verdes, Rolling Hills, Rolling Hills Estates, and unincorporated Palos Verdes Peninsula.
Marshall, a clinical informatics specialist at UC Irvine Health, is a longtime Torrance resident who has run for office before — including two bids for the California State Board of Equalization in 2018. His campaign centered on taxes, state spending, homelessness, and what he called pay-to-play politics in Sacramento. He had no major institutional endorsements and raised a fraction of what the leading Democrats spent in the race.
Goldsmith raised more than $2 million — more than any other candidate in the race. His endorsers included Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, his Harvard classmate. Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman, an independent who previously ran as a Republican, also backed him. So did West Hollywood Councilmember Lauren Meister, who passed over her colleague Erickson to do it.
The primary wasn’t kind to Erickson on other fronts either. At the California Democratic Party’s endorsing convention in February, he received 8% of delegate votes in his own senate district — eight votes out of 92. Malibu-based cardiologist Sion Roy won the endorsement with 67%. The West Hollywood Beverly Hills Democratic Club, headquartered in Erickson’s own city, failed to endorse anyone after Erickson got 56% of the membership vote and fell short of the 60% threshold. Goldsmith got 59%. Neither cleared the bar.
West Hollywood Councilmember Lauren Meister spoke against the committee’s recommendation of Erickson before that vote. “We can do better,” Meister said. That was all she said.
The campaign was a rough one. A WEHOonline op-ed called out Erickson for scrubbing any reference to his gay identity and to West Hollywood from his campaign website — a pattern that extended to his official ballot candidate statement, which contained zero mention of the city he has represented since 2020. Former West Hollywood Mayor Steve Martin wrote that a pro-Erickson mailer featuring drag donkeys looked more like a hit piece than a campaign ad, and raised questions about the political judgment behind it. Attack ads targeting Erickson cited his city-funded trip to Rome to meet Pope Francis and his taxpayer-funded trip to Paris for the Olympics Pride House torch handoff. Erickson responded with a mailer and a social media video calling those attacks homophobic. Many in the district questioned that framing.
WEHOonline covered the SD-24 race more extensively than any other local outlet. That coverage became fodder for attack mailers and ads targeting Erickson — several of which cited WEHOonline stories. Obviously, WEHOonline and its staff had no involvement in any campaign advertising or independent expenditure activity. Any such involvement would constitute a serious breach of journalistic ethics and a potential violation of the California Political Reform Act, enforced by the Fair Political Practices Commission. The stories were public, findable by anyone with a Wi-Fi connection and a Google search, and the campaigns that used them made their own choices about what to do with them. In a race where more than 90% of voters began with no opinion of any candidate, the repeated use of Erickson’s name in paid advertising is at minimum a data point worth noting.
Goldsmith, a former political journalist and media consultant, said during the campaign he never planned to run for office. Two things changed his mind, he told WEHOonline last week at the Helen Albert Farmers Market in Plummer Park: the 2024 election, and the January fires.
“Not just the outcome, but the way that the critique of our party was that we were the party of homelessness and disorder and crime,” Goldsmith said. “And there is some truth to that critique, and we’ve got to clean that up.”
The general election is November 3.
Related Coverage
As West Hollywood Reels From Two Shootings, Follow the Money in the SD-24 Senate Race
West Hollywood Beverly Hills Democratic Club SD-24 Endorsement Withheld
Op-Ed: Is West Hollywood John Erickson’s Dirty Little Secret?
Is John Erickson’s Senate Campaign in Its Flop Era?
Pelosi, Clinton, Buttigieg, and Meister Are Backing Him — SD-24 Frontrunner Brian Goldsmith on West Hollywood’s Hot-Button Issues
If Lindsey Horvath never befriended, or once spoke to John Erickson since they met when John Heilman appointed Lindsey as interim City Council after passing of Sal Guerrero….what would be the real deal? Lauren Meister stated, “we can do better” for a reason. Respecting civil service or municipal service defines itself by humbleness, advocacy and collective teamwork. It is not defined by Lindsey Horvath and John Heilman literally moving John Erickson into power with their powerful alliances and voice behind John. All the real estate developers, the Unions, the LA County Board of Supervisors and so many others honestly might… Read more »
Let’s hope that coming back to Weho council he’ll realize he needs to build a broader support base and listen to all his constituents, not just those that already agree with his agenda. The council represents ALL residents of West Hollywood!
not this current council.
Don’t get your hopes up. He’s vindictive and out for revenge.
If this vote holds and Erickson does wind up in third place, he will find a way to blame everybody but himself because part of his immaturity (in addition to all of his other many obnoxious imperfections) is that he can’t own his own sh*t!
Oh BOO, so we aren’t getting rid of John yet?? I thought my vote for him was a vote to get him outta here. What’s it with “John’s” and the council anyway???
Bring back the hair bleach, pearls and nail polish.
If G.Rick Marshall and Goldsmith hold (I am only seeing 67.08% of the vote in for SD24 per Decision Desk HQ) it really shows a microcosm of the greater civil war happening with the Democratic Party over what the message should be. I still do think based on the late votes now being counted that this won’t hold with Erickson going into the top two or just missing it. Goldsmith should have way more over an unknown Republican (less known that the other GOPer Kristina Irwin mind you) but because of the fragmentation of the party, the civil war over… Read more »
AP just corrected their count – only 60% of the vote has been counted.
Thanks. Just trying to understand the source. Are you using the AP Elections API showing SD-24 specifically at 89% counted, or is this a public AP number I’m just not finding? I would love to see these numbers (political junkie). I’m not seeing 89% on the public LA County or SOS pages. LA County reports 1,318,466 ballots counted countywide, which equals 22.38% turnout of roughly 5.89 million registered voters, but that seems countywide, not an SD-24-specific percent counted. SOS shows 217/217 precincts partially reporting, but I don’t see 89% counted.
The AP just updated their count. So yes, there is still 40% of the vote out. AP’s revision reflects a larger total expected vote universe than its overnight model projected. It does not change what has been counted. It changes what is still coming… 👀👀
Apologies, I think there were cross-comments while we were typing. The AP correction to 60% makes much more sense and lines up better with what I was seeing elsewhere. I was just confused because I couldn’t find the earlier 89% figure on the public LA County or SOS pages. Thanks for clarifying.
Congratulations to Brian Goldsmith on his victory. Congratulations to John Erickson on a great campaign he can be proud of. It’s time to get back to what is best for West Hollywood.
Proud of what? Scrubbing all references of West Hollywood from his campaign? False accusations of homophobia? What is best for West Hollywood is that John Erickson and Chelsea Byers and their arrogant and disconnected version of being “progressive” simply go away.
100% ‼️
Gotta agree with you, Steve!
Larry. I agree with Steve Martin’s response. Why should anyone be proud of his campaign as he scrubbed any mention of West Hollywood and changed his appearance to sway people?
Well, it looks like Erickson is going to get exactly what he deserves…a defeat. When you have bad policies and on top of that, you’re immature, vindictive, obnoxious, condescending and petty, things come back to bite you in the ass. And boy, did he get bit!
“West Hollywood Defeats Erickson” should be the headline. Essentially tied with a Republican, Goldsmith will be our new State Senator as the District remains overwhelmingly Democrat. Although West Hollywood should have been a bastion of support for our local Council member, enough disaffected WeHo residents denied Erickson his chance of victory.
Erickson campaigned as a new generation Democratic leader, yet his campaign relies heavily on traditional Democratic institutions and labor endorsements. Those endorsements, while admirable, created an expectation that he was the frontrunner, but institutional support cannot overcome voter concerns about a candidate’s personal style and record. His interactions with constituents during his years on the West Hollywood City Council often reflected extreme arrogance and impatience, and if he ultimately falls short, that disconnect between political insiders and voters may be a defining factor in the race’s outcome. Kindness and respect matter and ultimately, I believe, will prevail.
Does anyone recall Erickson’s attempt to enhance his profile by reading the Mueller Report in the Council Chamber? Perpetually hoping his brief and insincere attachments to various people and groups would indicate his character when it was simply a series of grand fabrications for a strange schizophrenic politician. Lindsey Horvath was a bit more adept when she sold out Weho during her campaign for Supervisor but equally as insincere and factually dishonest. How safe do we all feel as a result of their efforts?
The biggest story here is not that Brian Goldsmith advanced. Most observers saw that coming. The story is that John Erickson spent more than a year campaigning, enjoyed near-universal support from the incestuous West Hollywood political establishment bubble, labor organizations, and the usual Sacramento-aligned advocacy groups, yet still failed to make the runoff. Voters sent a clear message that endorsements, social media videos, and carefully curated narratives are not substitutes for thoughtful leadership. Erickson’s campaign often relied on slogans, grievance politics, and the assumption that voters would simply accept his version of events. They did not. Goldsmith now faces Republican… Read more »
The electorate seems to have told Erickson, “see you next Tuesday!”
John Erickson’s career in California senate is a non-starter funded by developers. His disgraceful hubris stole over 30k votes from Brian Goldsmith from voters who don’t know Erickson’s incompetence and corruption. In doing so, he helped a Republican lead the race, supporting Trump’s goals, which makes sense because Erickson is a narcissistic Trump wanna-be. Erickson doesn’t care for West Hollywood’s residents, he only cares for himself. Same happened when Chelsea Byers opposed Hilary Clinton. Erickson and Byers are using the Democrat label but the only party they care for is themselves. We all have to remember this when we vote… Read more »
Yes voters please remember!