DEAR WEHO: Fountain Avenue: The Street We Lost and The Lives We Can Save

Fountain Avenue claimed another victim Monday night.

by Nick Renteria

A man was simply trying to cross Fountain Avenue when a white sedan tore through the intersection at Havenhurst. Never slowing down, never swerving. Witnesses say the impact was so violent, they heard not one but two crashes: the first when the car hit him, the second when his body slammed against a parked car over 30 feet away. His shoes and personal belongings flew across the asphalt. One neighbor rushed outside to find him screaming in agony, his body twisted and broken in the street.

The driver never stopped. Kept speeding west, disappearing down the deadliest street in our city. This wasn’t a freak accident. It was a felony hit-and-run. And on Fountain, it was just a matter of time. Violence like this has become all too common on Fountain, but it wasn’t always like this.

Long before West Hollywood became a city, the County of Los Angeles exploited our lack of representation to expand the road into four lanes. There was no input from residents, no public meetings or discussions about how this would affect our community. The truth is, what was best for our community was never considered. They only considered what would allow outsiders to cut through our city the fastest. Our neighborhood street, once a quiet tree-lined avenue that connected homes and businesses, was sacrificed for the convenience of drivers. What we lost wasn’t just a street — it was a sense of ownership, and what we are left with now is a scar.

But we have the power now to undo the injustices of the past.

Imagine stepping out onto a Fountain Avenue designed for connection, not speed, where the sounds of rushing cars are replaced by the soft hum of life. The first thing you notice is the birds chirping, no longer drowned out by the sounds of honking and revving engines. The street is a neighborhood street again with two narrowed lanes that naturally slow down traffic, inviting drivers to move with caution. The sidewalks are wide and smooth, with shade trees offering a break from the heat. The street is dotted with benches inviting people to sit and enjoy the view of the beautiful architecture of the buildings that line the street. Neighbors wave as they bike by in large protected bike lanes, enjoying the cleaner air that comes with reduced traffic. It’s finally a space designed for you and me, not Los Angeles County.

This is the future of Fountain Avenue.

The last council election made it clear: West Hollywood wants this change. Pro-redesign candidates beat out opponents who ran on stopping the bike lanes. Despite the results of the ballot box, a vocal minority has attempted to derail progress at every turn. This opposition has used fear-mongering tactics and misinformation to neuter the Fountain Avenue Streetscape Plan, aiming to minimize its scope and impact despite undeniable evidence that these changes would save lives.

Ocean Avenue in Santa Monica is a prime example. Once a fast-moving thoroughfare dominated by car traffic, the street was redesigned with narrower lanes and the addition of protected bike lanes that slowed speeds. The results were dramatic: post-implementation LADOT studies revealed a 60% reduction in injury crashes. That’s not just a statistic. It means fewer lives shattered by collisions, fewer trips to the emergency room, and a community that feels safer for everyone.

There is no reason to wait.

Every day we delay, we risk being complicit in another tragedy. We have a real chance — right now — to reclaim our power. The blueprints are drawn, the funding is there, and we the people have spoken. We can build a Fountain Avenue that serves our needs. Where no one has to sprint across a crosswalk. Where we can walk, bike, and live without fear that we will be the next heartbreaking headline.

If change scares us, we should ask why we’ve grown comfortable with danger.

4.2 5 votes
Article Rating

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

28 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ida Lupino
Ida Lupino
7 months ago

And the VAST majority that are fighting returning Fountain to a SAFE neighborhood street DO NOT LIVE on Fountain. Bet they wouldn’t like if we turned their street into a GD mini freeway!

Peter Bonilla
Peter Bonilla
8 months ago

Brilliant article. I couldn’t agree more. If only everyone in our city government were as enlightened as Nick, WEHO could be paradise. I live on Flores a few yards South of the Fountain. I own a car and a motorcycle but I’d rather, walk, bicycle or take the bus…sadly, not the #2 on Sunset because that line is hard to access without getting killed by attempting to cross the Fountain Freeway.  Driving a motor vehicle should always be the very last option. Imagine how well traffic would flow if massive trucks, SUVs and cars were not always the default option… Read more »

Gimmeabreak
Gimmeabreak
10 months ago

Yes, this was a felony hit and run, but was he really driving too fast or, was it that the victim should have known better than to cross when and where he did? Does any of the blame for what happened fall on the guy who was hit? If narrowing Fountain is the cure to protect pedestrians then every four lane residential street in LA should do the same. Installing speed bumps is an option that I have never heard or read discussed although I have mentioned it several times. Increased traffic and the loss of parking spaces on the… Read more »

Ida Lupino
Ida Lupino
7 months ago
Reply to  Gimmeabreak

What a dumb** statement. ALL Pedestrians in the state of California have the right of way. You sound like you’d black a robbery victim for wear a watch, or a rape victim for being available at the right time and wrong place.

Jordan
Jordan
11 months ago

Great piece Nick! It seems like some of our neighbors are ok keeping Fountain dangerous since making it safer might slightly inconvenience them. It’s sad that road deaths and injuries are often seen as inevitable when in reality there are so many proven ways to make streets safer. Reducing the street to two lanes will make pedestrian crossings so much safer. A non-signalized crosswalk across 4 lanes of traffic is malpractice. I’m not sure why so many people refuse to acknowledge that street design is the most effective tool at changing driver behavior and making streets safer. The vast majority… Read more »

Ida Lupino
Ida Lupino
11 months ago

“This is the future of Fountain Avenue.” It was ALSO the PAST of Fountain Ave. BEFORE they turned it into an East West Freeway.
I support the change 1000%. NO MORE victims on Fountain!!!

PFA
PFA
11 months ago

While I understand the emotional impact of the accidents, I disagree about reducing Fountain to a now-lane-in-each-direction Avenue. The traffic and pollution would be absurd. I’ve lived on Fountain for 30+ years and I think speed cameras would be the way to go.

Gimmeabreak
Gimmeabreak
10 months ago
Reply to  PFA

….. and speed bumps!

TonyL
11 months ago

no. The way you have a safer passageway through town isn’t to eliminate traffic lanes. I live on Olive, which is a cut through. Sometimes the cars waiting to turn onto Santa Monica Blvd that Skip down from fountain are 15 deep. You can mitigate speed And increase safety without causing gridlock which is what that proposal will do. I’m also a neighbor who lives through the varying traffic patterns of our city and I think this is dead wrong. And I’ve advocated for making the two streets just south of Santa Monica one-way streets like the city of Santa… Read more »

Anonymous
Anonymous
11 months ago

I agree with you on many points. I do not believe the city has done enough taking action on making pedestrians safety the number one concern. I live on Fountain, near Havenhurst. That intersection is notoriously bad. Many vehicles never follow the flashing yellow crosswalk signals. They are difficult to see in the daylight and heading east the right side sign is completely blocked by a tree until you are on top of that intersection. These crosswalks should flash red as some do along Santa Monica Blvd along the Rainbow District. Vehicles actually stop as they should. I am for… Read more »

lol
lol
11 months ago

The vocal minority mentioned has reared its ugly head in these comments lol

Inquiring Minds Want to Know
Inquiring Minds Want to Know
11 months ago

@the author: you are using the battle cry and the exact verbiage of the council majority and outside interests that plague Weho politics, to work your way onto the Public Facilities Commission. Your knowledge of what was presented at City Council meetings regarding bike lanes is limited. You should go back and watch those meetings. Enlightenment is a beautiful thing. Have you seen the plan for Fountain? Have you talked to the first responders about safety and Fountain Ave? Have you spoken to the residents on Fountain?

New path forward!
New path forward!
11 months ago

We need to prioritize pedestrians, people on bicycles and public transportation more — that means we have to rethink our streets. It doesn’t mean “get rid of all cars” or being anti-car, it just means we have to find a better balance in order to make it safer and better for everyone. Some of the comments here are so aggressive and out of touch.

Grift Detector
Grift Detector
11 months ago

Follow da money!! The developers who want the contract to increase traffic and reduce lanes under the ridiculous guise of “bicycles“, are part of of an $8 million campaign. They in part funded John Erickson‘s campaign for city Council, and he does their bidding just like Trump does the bidding of Putin. It’s the same principle of pay for play politics. The city Council only wants the increase chaos project because it puts money in their pockets, like they’re all some kind of loose-cunted whore (with all due respect to actual escorts and sex workers). If that self-serving climber Erickson… Read more »