Op-Ed: MOVE OVER!

The nearly constant conversational topic in West Hollywood is bike lanes, pedestrian safety, and traffic. With the increase in car-caused deaths and injuries, public concern is at its highest level. This is not just a local matter. Cities across the country are dealing with a growing mix of cars, trucks, buses, bikes, scooters, and delivery robots — oh, and yes, pedestrians. A full page in the July 27 edition of the New York Times covers “The Battle for the Streets” in Toronto, Canada. (It could well be New York City.)

The situation has simply snuck up on us locally. We were unprepared for such changing conditions — unless our planners knew but had no remedies. Like Delhi at morning rush, the ultimate urban crush is here. What’s next?


A little history. When we moved to West Hollywood in 1974 — then a county backwater known mostly for being an unregulated playground — the residential streets were quiet and undisturbed by traffic. A car every hour was normal on our side streets. Parking was not a problem. The park boasted a busy softball field, and the Jackson Five played pickup basketball with my oldest boy. Quite a few residents were production people from the nearby movie and recording studios. A number of well-known actors quietly maintained in-town pieds-à-terre here and were our undisturbed neighbors.

One could cross a street with confidence of reaching the other side without incident. Neighbor Dave could saunter up the block every evening with his parrot on his shoulder, followed by his canvasback duck, Molly, chatting with friends along the way. Commercial trucks never entered residential streets, obeying the load limit signs.

When cityhood came ten years later, the rhythm of the area was already being altered by increasing population and traffic passing through. The clock was moving faster. The future was upon us without warning.


Traffic problems are not unique to West Hollywood, as every person with a driver’s license can attest. It is a regional problem, and to properly address it will take much political will and a desire to work with other communities toward a mutual solution. Knowing how ponderously and slowly all governments move, citizens will have to keep prodding them for action and results.

That we have yet to develop a county-wide transit system worthy of handling the huge population is a failure of previous local administrations in love with personal automobiles and the ease with which they discontinued the Red Line trolleys.

Another important factor is compliance with the current rules. For the past twelve years, I have been a passenger, not a driver, and have had time and opportunity to observe how cars, trucks, bikes, and motorcycles use the road. It gets crazy at times as people use shortcuts and make dangerous moves. The DMV should consider revising road rules for cyclists — a growing presence on the road.


Fountain Avenue had always been my default route when returning from LA city. And I was certainly not the only one. More than once I was startled by a car suddenly emerging from a cross street and jumping in front of me. Accidents and deaths on this stretch of pavement make it a huge community concern.

Whatever the Council comes up with as an answer will displease many. There is no one simple fix that will appease all residents and concerned groups.

If I had my way, I’d allow parking only on one side. The other side would have an expanded bike lane. Street sweeping would require shifting parking to the opposite side. Four-way stop signs at every intersection. Speed limits reduced to 20 miles per hour. Three formal — with warning signs and painted walkways — pedestrian crosswalks needed.

Let’s see, is there anyone I haven’t angered? Our car culture is strangling our cities, and changing it will take grit and understanding. Are we up to it?


While I’m at it, here are some more thoughts on traffic of all kinds in WEHO:

  • Limit store deliveries to nighttime — say 2300 to 0400 hours.

  • Eventually (they are coming!) only electric delivery and service trucks.

  • More cul-de-sacs to discourage through traffic.

  • Reduce speed limits on our Main Street — Santa Monica Blvd. — to 20 MPH.

  • Add many more formal pedestrian crosswalks on busier streets.

  • Install four-way crosswalks (see one at UCLA in Westwood) at our busiest intersections — e.g., San Vicente and Santa Monica.

  • Connect our bike lanes with those in adjoining cities.

  • Shorten the length of street-parking spaces on commercial streets to encourage smaller vehicles.

  • Stop worrying about inconveniencing car drivers. They are the target. I’d guess that 75% of the cars on WEHO streets during the day are just passing through. They don’t spend any money here.


There must be many more ideas among the residents — and our business community — on this subject. Let’s flood the Council with them. To deal with the impending future, we must be bold in the present.

As Mammy Yokum used to say, “Time’s a-wastin’!”

3.7 3 votes
Article Rating

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

10 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nick Renteria
Nick Renteria
6 months ago

Carleton I couldn’t agree more. I think we have allowed our city to be a short cut for commuters instead of developing streets that make us a destination. A solution I’d also like to add is the implementation of congestion pricing along Sunset and SMB. Cleaner air, less traffic, and safer streets for us, plus a pretty penny for the city to use to deliver road upgrades and redesigns like the cul-de-sacs and other improvements you mention.

Carolyn C.
Carolyn C.
6 months ago

Dear Carleton, Why wrap up your op-ed with anger and negativity? “Let’s see, is there anyone I haven’t angered? Our car culture is strangling our cities…” Don’t we have enough divisiveness in our country already? I am of the school of contributing to the solution, not the problem. For one, please, let us know how eliminating parking on one side of the street will help the issue? Where will those people park their cars? 3, 2, 1 go! BTW, a few facts “…failure of previous local administrations in love with personal automobiles and the ease with which they discontinued the Red… Read more »

Last edited 6 months ago by Carolyn C.
Carleton Cronin
6 months ago
Reply to  Carolyn C.

Thank you for calling me out re my editorial tone. I weLcome all such comments as I contInue to learn about myself and my fellow humans.
Perhaps the vinegar of old age (at 93) has soured my views of the workings of those we elect to manage our municipal affairs. I might not be available for the next election…

Carolyn C.
Carolyn C.
6 months ago

Age=wisdom in my book, Carleton. We all continue to learn. We certainly agree on the “souring” aspect. Some elected officials in WeHo have certainly fallen short. With input from knowledgeable professionals in the urban planning and traffic sector, hopefully, City Councilmembers will find better solutions for the Fountain Avenue challenges.

:dpb
:dpb
6 months ago

Bikes are a huge problem. They ride three across often claiming 1-1/2 lanes, they ride on the sidewalk, they don’t stop at stop signs, traffic lights and cross two lanes to make left hand turns with no signaling. They are as bad as the entitled car drivers in Weho, doing whatever they want on a bicycle, weaving in and out of traffic and then playing the victim when god forbid any accident occurs. They are never at fault and always the victim of drivers. B/S. Time the damn bikers take some responsibility for their own actions and safety and stop… Read more »

Last edited 6 months ago by :dpb
Simon Wan
Simon Wan
6 months ago
Reply to  :dpb

A lot of cars also don’t stop at stop signs and fail to use turn signal…..regardless, the reason we are angry with each other is due to lack of BETTER PLANNING of our streets — there are no proper bike lanes, thus why we are in the streets or sidewalk. Makes sense? I’ve seen firsthand how a city can change for the better, where less accidents, more people-power and urban environments encourage better behavior.

Last edited 6 months ago by Simon Wan
Westmount Dr. Resident
Westmount Dr. Resident
6 months ago
Reply to  :dpb

You might want to look up VEH 21202 before penning comments like this. When a lane is too narrow for a car and cycle to move side by side (this is going to apply to 99% of aterials in WeHo, and a large number of side streets), a single cyclist is permitted to occupy the entire lane. The next time you see three bicycle side by side occupying two lanes in a single direction, do please take a picture, because it will be the first time anyone has captured this unicorn in person.

Gimmeabreak
Gimmeabreak
6 months ago

When a pedestrian or bicyclist is hit why is it automatically assumed to be the fault of the automobile driver? I see pedestrians all the time making risky crossings, and why do bicyclists think it is the obligation of the entire rest of the world to adjust to their arrogance in riding on a street that is just not intended for them? There is no “right” to ride a bicycle, but one would hope they would have the good sense to keep themselves out of danger. But instead the solution appears to be to make life immeasurably more difficult for… Read more »

Last edited 6 months ago by Gimmeabreak
Simon Wan
Simon Wan
6 months ago
Reply to  Gimmeabreak

I make “risky crossings” and almost get hit by cars every day even when it’s MY turn to cross. With better planning of our streets and crossings, including just one or two protected bikes lanes through the city, we would avoid A LOT of the issues we’re all so done with.

anonymous
anonymous
6 months ago

My observation and concern is how we have made the convenience of motor vehicles into th enemy and cause of ALL accidents. While I do agree that some motorists need to be held accountable for speed and leaving the scene of an accident, most accidents are just that. Accidents! It takes all forms of mobility to pay attention and respect the street rules. Motorists and residents living on these streets do not need to have amenities taken away on a major thoroughfare to accommodate bike lanes on a street that everyone can agree is unsafe for so many reasons. Reducing… Read more »