Red States’ Banned Books Reek of Racism & Tyranny

Today, I received the latest list of books banned in red states. Among them:

  • I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings (1969) by Maya Angelou
  • To Kill a Mockingbird (1960) by Harper Lee winner of the Pulitzer Prize.
  • The Hate U Give (2017) by Angie Thomas, a modern classic
  • The Color Purple (1982) by Alice Walker, winner of both the Pulitzer Prize and the National Book Award
  • The Bluest Eye and Beloved by Toni Morrison, Nobel Laureate in Literature

These titles join a long list that includes:

Slaughterhouse-Five, Of Mice and Men, The Catcher in the Rye, The Handmaid’s Tale, and dozens of queer-authored works—join over 100 books erased from classrooms and libraries across the states.

We are now in times similar to the period before Adolf Hitler’s rise to power, known as the Weimar Years. Weimar Germany was revolutionary in its openness toward sexual identity and freedom. The world’s first openly gay publications emerged during this time, alongside a thriving cabaret scene—hundreds of venues that celebrated color, expression, and a rejection of traditional moral codes through avant-garde art, books, and entertainment.

The cinema of the era was daring and politically charged. Films explored themes ranging from authoritarianism to gender roles. The 1929 film Diary of a Lost Girl depicted the ostracism of a young woman after having an illegitimate child, and Fassbinder’s Different from the Others confronted issues of forced sex work and conflicted sexual identity. These bold explorations provoked cultural debates that would soon be silenced when the era’s art, film, and literature were destroyed—burned in Nazi bonfires in a wave of censorship and intolerance.

Weimar had been a mosaic of ideas, cultures, religions, sexual identities, and diversity, igniting fear among reactionary forces. The simultaneous rise of political extremism and sexual liberation spurred backlash. Traditionalists saw the era’s social transformations as a threat to “German” and “Nordic” identity. Efforts emerged to purge the country of Jewish, “foreign,” and “degenerate” influences, leading to a conservative drive to reassert Christian nationalist values. The Weimar Republic’s collapse paved the way for authoritarian rule, years before the full horrors of the Holocaust were realized. The systematic dismantling of intellectual freedom, the silencing of dissident voices, and the persecution preceded the murder of millions.

Banning books is not about protecting children—it is a direct assault on freedom. It silences voices that challenge power, erases history, and suppresses uncomfortable truths. Books that explore race, gender, sexuality, and justice are not dangerous—they are essential. Authoritarian regimes have always feared free thought. These bans reflect that same fear—fear of truth, of empathy, and historical accountability. A healthy democracy does not fear difficult conversations; it requires them. Erasing stories doesn’t protect society—it distorts it. To ban a book is an act of violence against knowledge, against memory, and against liberty itself. The foundational principles of our democracy are being undermined when governments endorse the removal of books from public discourse. Intellectual freedom and critical thinking are not luxuries—they are under siege.

 Ten years before I was born, Hitler was in power. One hundred years before I was born, our Supreme Court enshrined white supremacy into the US Constitution when Chief Justice Roger Taney wrote the words that denied all Black people the protection of citizenship in the Dred Scott case. We seem to be moving backwards quickly.

In the abhorrent words of the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court Roger B. Taney, March 6, 1857: “They [Black people] had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations; and so far inferior, that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.”

I don’t get paid for writing for WeHo Online, and like my publisher, bring you this information because we love our little Village. If you feel strongly about something I say, please make a comment and pass this story along so together we remain woke and proud.

3 2 votes
Article Rating

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

10 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MAGA GAY
MAGA GAY
6 months ago

Age appropriate guidelines are not banning…
Yet another gaslighting…
2nd hand embarrassment, incoming.

Cece
Cece
4 months ago
Reply to  MAGA GAY

You nailed it. #Facts

Joel Rothschilld
Joel Rothschilld
6 months ago

The Color Purple is among the thousands of books that have been caught in the wave of book banning documented by PEN America in recent years. Since 2021, the novel has been removed from school or library shelves in at least three U.S. counties. I strongly encourage readers never to take anyone’s word blindly—including mine. Always consult credible sources. The facts presented above are supported by reliable outlets, including reporting from the Iowa Banner. If anything, this article only begins to scratch the surface of a much deeper issue. Please, don’t fault the messenger—direct your concern toward those actively working to suppress… Read more »

Ham
Ham
6 months ago

This isn’t true. The issue is about age appropriate books for kids. Another 80/20. Keep digging.

BloodshotEyedGuy
BloodshotEyedGuy
6 months ago
Reply to  Ham

Thank you, Ham! Their gaslighting nonsense is so ridiculous.

Gimmeabreak
Gimmeabreak
6 months ago

I don’t think this is true … at all! The singer Pink heard that these titles were banned and she made a very public position to provide these titles to a community, only to find out she had been given entirely wrong information. All those books were still on the shelves. The only books that have been banned anywhere are those that are not age-appropriate in schools, or those that are clearly absolutely porn, as any clear headed person would agree. There are certainly some people who think porn should be available for any age, but not most of us.… Read more »

Last edited 6 months ago by Gimmeabreak
Taxpayer
Taxpayer
6 months ago
Reply to  Gimmeabreak

YUP. No source of this so called information. More TDS. If a book contains descriptions or depictions of a “sex act” that are not age-appropriate for kindergartners through grade12 they should not be in a school library. Adult content belongs with adults. How’s that for a radical idea.

Last edited 6 months ago by Taxpayer
Joel Rothschilld
Joel Rothschilld
6 months ago
Reply to  Gimmeabreak

Nope I have the complete offical lists from Florida, Texas, Iowa it’s not hard for you to look them up and included above is an image from Iowa. I write these articles to bring WeHo’ians awareness that extends beyond our little Oasis. I regret that my hard unpaid work is discounted without any research.

Last edited 6 months ago by Joel Rothschilld
BloodshotEyedGuy
BloodshotEyedGuy
6 months ago
Reply to  Gimmeabreak

Exactly. And rather than admit her mistake, she doubled down with the ignorance. It is possible to be gay and think for yourself without parroting what any one political side wants you to believe.

Brian Joseph
Brian Joseph
6 months ago

Great piece. The idea that books “turn” kids is absurd — if that were true, the overwhelming influence of the straight world would’ve turned all LGBTQ+ people. These bans aren’t about protection. They’re about erasure. Thanks for calling it what it is.