Faring Capital Is Back With a New Plan — Robertson Row. Questions Remain

Robertson Row | Faring Capital

Faring Capital, the developer behind West Hollywood’s long-stalled Robertson Lane project held a community meeting Wednesday to present “Robertson Row,” a scaled-down commercial project for the 2.27-acre site at Santa Monica Boulevard and Robertson that’s been a vacant block(s) for nearly a decade. Several dozen people were in the Zoom session, the first public presentation since Faring’s entitlements expired last June. 

 Jake Stevens, Faring’s senior vice president, opened by calling the corner of Santa Monica and Robertson one of the most important intersections in the city. “This important block, just steps away from a brand new rail metro station at San Vicente Avenue, in the heart of the Rainbow District, deserves more than asphalt parking lots and tall warehouse walls crowding the sidewalk property line,” Stevens said.

The new project will have four one-to-three-story buildings totaling approximately 110,000 square feet of above-ground space. The presentation indicated it was designed for boutique retail, restaurants, cafes, “wellness tenants,” and gallery spaces connected by a network of pedestrian walkways and courtyards. A two-level underground parking garage and a 120-foot two-sided digital billboard on Santa Monica Boulevard will also be part of the project.

The Factory building

The original Factory circa 1920’s | Faring Captial

The centerpiece of the project remains the Factory building, the historic 1929 Trescon prefabricated industrial structure that housed Mitchell Camera Corporation before becoming Studio One, the iconic and pioneering gay disco, in 1974. The building was dismantled in 2020 with plans to reassemble it as part of the Robertson Lane hotel project. The Factory’s components have been in storage for nearly six years.

Under Robertson Row, the Factory would be reassembled and repositioned at the corner of Santa Monica and Robertson, facing the boulevard. Katie Horak, principal at Architectural Resources Group, said every panel, truss, and window was catalogued before disassembly. “Good condition and fair condition — all of those component parts were disassembled and are currently in storage,” Horak said. “Anything that was in poor condition was discarded because we couldn’t reuse those materials.”

Image | Faring Capital

She said the building’s Trescon system — a modular fireproof industrial construction method developed in the 1920s — made disassembly unusually tractable. New steel panels and windows would be fabricated to match original specifications wherever salvaged material is insufficient. The original woodblock dance floors from Studio One, which Stevens said are being stored in climate-controlled conditions, would be reinstalled.

Studio One operated at the site from 1974 to 1993. The National Trust for Historic Preservation added the Factory building to its list of America’s 11 Most Endangered Historic Places in 2015. The building is listed on the California State Register of Historic Places. Joan Rivers hosted one of the nation’s early AIDS fundraisers there in March 1984. The site later housed Axis, The Backlot, Girl Bar, Ultra Suede, and other LGBTQ venues through the 1990s.

Under the proposal, the reassembled Factory building would house galleries, restaurants, and cafes. Horak said interpretive materials telling the building’s history would be integrated into the finished project. 

A feature-length documentary, Studio One Forever, covering the club’s history from the disco era through the AIDS crisis, is now available on Apple TV and other digital platforms. “The Factory building will forever be an LGBT landmark on Santa Monica Boulevard,” Stevens said. 

Studio One | Faring Capital

Horak also confirmed all mitigation measures from the original Robertson Lane approval will hold in the current technical report. This means the partnership with ONE Archives, (the Los Angeles-based repository of LGBTQ history) to develop an on-site exhibition inside the Factory building, along with a planned oral history project tied to Studio One is still set to happen.

Design and layout

Robinson Row | Faring Capital

Duncan Paterson, design principal at Gensler, presented renderings that showed a village-like arrangement of buildings with shaded passages, pocket parks, and courtyards connecting the three street frontages — Robertson, La Peer, and Santa Monica. The project is bounded roughly between Robertson and La Peer from north to south across the block, with Santa Monica at the north end and the project adjacent to West Hollywood Park on the Robertson side.

“Every door is a front door,” Paterson said. “No street is left without a front door.”

Escalators would bring visitors from the subterranean garage directly up into the center of the project. Paterson said building heights were intentionally kept low — two stories on the Robertson side, three on La Peer — to create a transition toward the park and to the lower-scale buildings to the east. The architecture drew on what he described as Mediterranean village references reinterpreted through a contemporary palette of brick, natural wood, smooth stucco, and wrought iron.

Proposed billboard at Santa Monica and Robertson | Faring Capital

Benjamin Anderson, principal at Office Untitled, presented the proposed 120-foot digital billboard at Santa Monica Boulevard. He said the structure will use a triangular truss system rather than a single pole to reduce visual bulk. Two sign faces with an organic “petal” shape are separated by open space, which Anderson said was designed to reduce wind load and perceived scale. He also said the sign was designed to “support the creation of a major civic moment and serve at the gateway to the newly designated Rainbow District.” Patterson said the project “creates an arrival experience that welcomes people from all directions.”

Entitlements and timeline

Image | Faring Capital

Land use attorney DJ Moore of Paul Hastings said the application seeks a general plan amendment, specific plan amendment, zone map amendment, certificate of appropriateness for the Factory building, development agreement, and a conditional use permit for wellness uses. The existing Robertson Lane Specific Plan, which has governed the site since the original 2018 hotel approval, would be renamed and revised to reflect the new project’s lower density and reorganized sub-areas.

The City retained third-party environmental consultant Dudek to prepare an addendum to the previously certified environmental impact report. Moore said Faring anticipates no new or more severe environmental impacts given the project’s significantly reduced scale — roughly half the square footage of what was previously approved, with no hotel and a shallower parking structure.

The application was submitted in August 2025. Environmental review is expected to conclude within the next month or so. A Historic Preservation Commission hearing is anticipated in July or August, followed by design review, a full Planning Commission hearing, and City Council consideration later this fall.

Questions

Jonathan Finestone, president of West Hollywood West Residents Association, asked Stevens to clarify an opening statement where Stevens appeared to list the association among community groups that had collaborated on the project. Stevens said he already addressed the issue at the top of the meeting after receiving Finestone’s complaint. “I am not in any way, shape, or form saying that West Hollywood West Residents Association has approved, been informed of, or been presented to about this project,” Stevens said.

One resident asked about tree coverage along Robertson Boulevard’s public sidewalk. Stevens said those decisions are made by the City, not Faring, and fall under the Melrose Design District streetscape master plan. He also said he had been unable to get the final streetscape plans from the City despite months of asking.

Another person on the Zoom asked about water table issues and potential flooding during construction, referring to similar problems at the Melrose Triangle project. Stevens said Faring has completed geotechnical studies and that the project’s two-level parking structure is far shallower than the previous seven-story excavation proposed for Robertson Lane. “We’re not creating Lake West Hollywood,” he said.

A business owner near the site asked how Faring would support neighboring businesses during construction. Stevens said the company would develop a construction mitigation plan and work with the Design District BID and the Chamber of Commerce, as it did during previous project iterations. He offered to meet with her directly.

One attendee gave props to the architectural approach. Another wanted a stated policy on unhoused people on the site. Stevens said the project would have security and declined to elaborate, telling them to email him for follow-up.

It wasn’t clear if Faring has financing in place or when they might break ground. Stevens offered no timeline beyond the entitlement hearing schedule. Faring’s track record has them letting entitlements expire on two major West Hollywood projects — Robertson Lane and the French Market. The result has been anything but good for residents. The Factory building has been in storage since 2020. WEHOonline reached out for comment on financing and if there was a projected groundbreaking date. We’ll update the story if we get a response.

Written questions about the project can be submitted to Stevens at jake@faring.com. Members of the public with questions about the City’s review process can contact Gallo at agallo@weho.org.

Robertson Row’s project addresses are 645–681 N. Robertson Blvd., 648–654 N. La Peer Dr., and 8954 Santa Monica Blvd.

5 1 vote
Article Rating

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

22 Comments
Newest
Oldest
John McCormick
John McCormick
1 month ago

Look on the bright side, by the time this thing might ever get built, the Kardashians will be so old they’ll be hawking designer adult diapers on that tacky outlet store billboard… remember this when you’re voting for new city council members in the very near future.

Really now...
Really now...
1 month ago

Our City Council should never, ever let Faring build anything else in West Hollywood EVER !

Todd
Todd
1 month ago

Billboard is terrible. I suspect this project will be DOA, like so many other Faring projects. Bummer, aside from the ridiculous billboard, it actually looks pretty nice.

J T
J T
1 month ago

This will never be built, lol.

hmm hmm
hmm hmm
1 month ago
Reply to  J T

$$ talks..with everything else being ‘approved’ i would be surprised if its not..that OR I could see the city buying it for their own plans

david
david
1 month ago

City staff and city council should disclose how a 120 foot tall double-sided billboard has made it through plan checks when zoning codes do NOT permit or allow new billboard construction along SMB. Why are zones and codes created and then acceptors made for a developer with a horrible track record of completing projects. John Erickson had spoken about this billboard and now staff/council/commissions are using these billboards as a method to gain “affordable” housing. Our elected officials and city hall employees have turned their backs on honesty and sold out to developers and billboard companies all touting extraordinary benefits… Read more »

Micky
Micky
1 month ago
Reply to  david

Its probably because John Erickson and Jake Stevens are friends.

Last edited 1 month ago by Micky
Roy Oldenkamp
Roy Oldenkamp
1 month ago

This is a much less dense project. The electronic billboard is sited on a major street, so the impact to the community is lessened. It also won’t be overwhelming a cultural asset like the monster above The Whiskey. The placement of The Factory building on Santa Monica Blvd at Robertson is a logical and compelling placement. This iteration makes sense. And, we likely have enough hotels presently.

Kev
Kev
1 month ago
Reply to  Roy Oldenkamp

We want more density and a more lively active city

Steve Martin
Steve Martin
1 month ago

The proposed 120 foot double sided digital billboard represents an assault on the City’s long held policy to prohibit new billboards on Santa Monica and try to eliminate existing ones. The digital billboard simply reflects that this project remains fiscally un-viable unless the developer is able to finance the project with advertising income. This just looks like another grab for entitlements as it is unlikely Faring will have the ability to actually construct this project for decades to come. It opens the door to wholesale approval of digital billboards along the length of Santa Monica, something residents have consistently opposed.

David
David
1 month ago

Faring’s representative is and has been arrogant whenever he is asked legitimate questions and concerns. I don’t understand why West Hollywood does business with this company. Their track record is horrible of bringing projects to completion. I also hate that the city has allowed a 120 foot double sided billboard into a design that the zoning does NOT permit. There are agenda items now in the works to accommodate the developers requests to change zoning along SMB, La Cienega, La Brea , and Fairfax. Because of this sign. Tha biggest takeaway is they don’t sound like they have the funds… Read more »

:dpb
:dpb
1 month ago

Lost me at 120 foot 2-sided digital billboard. No f—king way.

Pavarotti
Pavarotti
1 month ago

I fully agree with the criticism of Faring’s representative, a Senior Vice President no less. His behavior was consistently unprofessional. He repeatedly interrupted other presenters, rudely dismissed legitimate concerns about homeless use of the site, and generally adopted an arrogant peacocking attitude. Make no mistake, this was HIS meeting. While the project is undeliably a vast improvement over the previous one, the unnecesssary, ugly, and bolted-on digital billboard is a simple money grab, and creates a precedent in an otherwise billboard-free area. To make matters worse, he chose to appear in what is best described as a pink tiger-print romper… Read more »

wtff
wtff
1 month ago

:\ get ready for the influx of digital billboards up and down SM blvd. sigh

WeHo used to be a nice place to live
WeHo used to be a nice place to live
1 month ago

First off, the Faring representative was very rude and had an attitude. At the end of the meeting, one person had a very valid question and he didn’t like the question and when pressed he simply instructed staff to terminate her microphone. The meeting felt rushed and it felt like there was no engagement with the community rather just going through the motions to get it done. Second, that 12 story full motion double-sided billboard is outrageous! Completely out of scale with the rest of the project which contains buildings of only one to three stories. While I’m sure there… Read more »

Last edited 1 month ago by WeHo used to be a nice place to live