They’re Not Going Down Without a Fight: West Hollywood Residents Take On SB 79

The West Hollywood West Residents Association is hosting a town hall Wednesday night for homeowners and renters who want to know what happens to their block when SB 79 takes effect July 1.

The answer, residents say, is that five-to-eight story developments could rise virtually everywhere in West Hollywood — obliterating the single-family neighborhoods and low-rise streets that people bought into with a lifetime of savings. They are not NIMBYs. They are homeowners and long-term renters who invested in a neighborhood with a century of zoning behind it, and they are not going down without a fight.

The meeting is April 22 at 6:30 p.m. at the ARC/Pool Building, fifth floor, 8750 El Tovar Place. No City staff. No elected officials. Jonathan Finestone, president of the association, organized it.

A mailer went out to households across West Hollywood West and surrounding neighborhoods this week. It is not subtle. “100 years of zoning overridden,” it says. “R-1 zoning eliminated.” Residents are told they are living in an “upzoning zone” now. The exposure gets called “modern-day redlining.” Sacramento, the mailer says, is forcing the rezoning of most of West Hollywood — and the City’s hands are not tied. The City can protect residents. It has “refused to go there.”

“Stop the destruction of your beautiful neighborhoods. Stop the steal of your private property rights.”

Image provided by WHWRA

Finestone also sent WEHOonline his version of the map. Six rezoning radii, blanketing West Hollywood and a lot of what’s around it. He flagged it as not covering Beverly Hills. or other parts of Los Angeles.

SB 79 — the Abundant and Affordable Homes Near Transit Act — was signed by Governor Newsom last October. It overrides local zoning near qualifying transit stations. High-density development, approved by right. No public hearing. No Council vote. Seventy-two days from Sunday.

West Hollywood’s three future Metro K Line station areas got locked in by the Metro Board on March 26: Santa Monica and San Vicente, Santa Monica and Fairfax, Santa Monica and La Brea. The city covers 1.9 square miles. A half-mile upzoning radius around three stations is a lot of West Hollywood. The Southern California Association of Governments is still drawing the map of which specific parcels fall inside those zones. That goes before SCAG’s Regional Council in June. One month before the law takes effect.

Residents who bought into R-1 neighborhoods say Sacramento just rewrote the rules on them. West Hollywood never voted on SB 79. No local hearing was required. Block-by-block decisions got made in Sacramento.

West Hollywood has not filed a Transit-Oriented Development Alternative Plan with the state. TODAPs let cities shape where density lands and set design standards — but the overall capacity the law requires stays in place. You can guide it. You cannot stop it. Beverly Hills filed its plan in January. West Hollywood has not.

The fight is everywhere right now. Newsom has warned 15 cities and counties: comply with SB 79 in 30 days or face state lawsuits. Los Angeles hit every pause button in the law — exempted fire zones, low-income neighborhoods, historic districts, then preemptively upzoned higher-income single-family areas just enough to qualify for a delay until 2030. San Francisco is trying something similar. LA’s City Attorney has been organizing other cities around a potential legal challenge. Nothing filed yet.

Legal challenges to housing laws like this one have a lousy track record in California. After a 2021 law let homeowners split their lots into as many as four units, cities sued. Some explored municipal charters. One floated becoming a mountain lion refuge. None of it worked. Experts say resistance to SB 79 probably won’t show up until after July 1 anyway — there’s no reason to fight a law that hasn’t taken effect yet.

West Hollywood has not pursued any of those options publicly.

Monday the City Council takes up inclusionary housing rules — the affordability requirements that will govern whatever actually gets built here once SB 79 kicks in. West Hollywood’s 20 percent standard beats SB 79’s 7 to 13 percent baseline. The City confirmed to WEHOonline the local rule still applies.

Then-Mayor Chelsea Byers stood in front of a room full of angry residents at the December ZIP town hall — same building, same issues — and said what the City’s position was. “We are not going to let the City get sued into oblivion because we make some arrogant decision that we have a better attitude than the state,” she said. “We can play ball and make sure that we are working our best to be diligent and get these issues dealt with ourselves before the state comes in, or the state is going to do it for us.”

Planning Director Nick Maricich that same night: “There are state laws that have already changed what can be built in the R1s today. And there are other state laws that may come to impact these existing R1 areas. Some of these things are not our decision.”

RSVP at wehowest.com. Questions to hello@wehowest.com.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

22 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ida Lupino
Ida Lupino
22 days ago

Ya get what you vote for….ALL democrats in Sacramento bringing it home to the voters.

Frank
Frank
23 days ago

Please destroy single family zoning. Thank you.

Edie
Edie
23 days ago
Reply to  Frank

Single family zoning is what makes Weho great! You are a transient. TYou have no interest in making this city your permanent home. But for renters like myself, who have lived here 30+ years, I despise the fact that developers own our city council. And that we are turning into a city for the rich.

Kimberleigh Zolciack
Kimberleigh Zolciack
24 days ago

Glad to see all the wealthy homeowners who want to dictate what their neighbor can do with their properties and that 5 story buildings are somehow evil.

Tara
Tara
24 days ago

Wealthy? I am on Social Security and bought my home decades ago. Jealous?

Kimberleigh Zolciack
Kimberleigh Zolciack
21 days ago
Reply to  Tara

Tell me how your property will lose value if a taller building is built?

WeHo Conscience
WeHo Conscience
25 days ago

Glad to see this issue getting coverage in WeHo. Every city in the state is having a similar reaction.

Eliminating single family zoning strikes at the heart of California’s scenic and historic neighborhoods all up and down the state.

There is a similar reaction in Palm Springs as there is in Beverly Hills, Pasadena, Santa Barbara, San Diego Monterey and every coastal town in California.

I urge consideration of a statewide initiative to repeal the law and create new protections for Single Family zoning.

I believe it will succeed with a groundswell of support just like Prop 13.

Last edited 25 days ago by WeHo Conscience
Kimberleigh Zolciack
Kimberleigh Zolciack
24 days ago

California has too much housing. We need to start demolishing dense apartment blocks and replace them with parking lots.

Tara
Tara
24 days ago

Brian. I am thinking ^^ this one could be a troll.

david
david
25 days ago

Since none of our city council, city staff, city attorney, all commission members refuse to fight back, as they all state their hands are tied, is simply appalling. Nobody in their right minds should find SB79 best for the future of our city. SB79 is nothing but an excuse for developers to overbuild and not have to build to zoning codes. Thank goodness residents are finally gathering together to do what our elected officials should be doing. The Metro K Line is just one more puzzle piece to say overbuild as you see fit. Time to vote and let your… Read more »

Tara
Tara
24 days ago
Reply to  david

Meister and Hoopingarner fought back. The rest are complicit.

Peter Buckley
Peter Buckley
25 days ago

Rats in a corner have to fight back. Byers is just appalling that she lies there are no SB79 options as part of her quest to get developer sponsors for future higher office candidacy.

Izzy M.
Izzy M.
25 days ago

Can anybody confirm whether SB79 actually applies to the 3 new proposed weho subway stops on the K Line at this time? The law goes into effect July 1, but we are a long ways off still from the new stops being funded or actually built. My understanding was that the recent K Line approval was contingent on Weho securing its massive funding commitment, so I’m wondering whether SB79’s application in this area is similarly contingent.

Tara
Tara
24 days ago
Reply to  Izzy M.

Yes, it does. Sadly, even though the Metro may not arrive until 2049, if that, and Measure M won’t go into effect until 2041, plus the City Council has to figure out how to come up with $4billion to pay for the three stops (about $112,000 per resident), developers are already exploiting the effects of SB79 and other damning legislation. The newly City-approved Hayworth project and Santa Monica Blvd at Ogden project are prime examples of the City claiming their “hands are tied” when they aren’t at all. Beverly Hills is working on a plan to prevent the damage of… Read more »

Last edited 24 days ago by Tara
Lane
Lane
24 days ago
Reply to  Izzy M.

It only goes into effect after the subway stations are open and operating. So we are decades away from any of this having an effect on the city itself

WeHo Pete
WeHo Pete
24 days ago
Reply to  Lane

Unfortunately not sure that’s true. theres a lot of ambiguity not helped by Byers etc refusing to consider the options. We need to kick her out and get a better policy in place. Hopefully Wednesdays meeting will help clarify exactly what the timelines are and how to get Byers removed before she does even more damage with her sponsor Solomon.

The corruption in WeHo council is shattering us
The corruption in WeHo council is shattering us
24 days ago
Reply to  Lane

You’re. Absolutely wrong. SB79 starts applying on July 1 even though subway won’t open until 2050. Do your research before you mislead readers. Situation is catastrophic for West Hollywood

Tara
Tara
24 days ago
Reply to  Lane

It goes into effect July 1, but developers are already exploiting it and Erickson, Hang and Byers are happy to give them free reign.

Jay
Jay
25 days ago

Thank you Jonathan Finestone for organizing this town hall to protect the essence of West Hollywood against rampant development. There is a balance to be struck between adding housing and maintaining neighborhood feel. Sadly, the current council majority clearly doesn’t give a rat’s patootie about the existing, longstanding, fabric of West Hollywood’s diverse neighborhoods or residents. As cities such as Los Angeles and Beverly Hills have demonstrated, West Hollywood has other options than just rolling over and acceding to the State’s whims. A prompt, timely, TODAP that prioritizes development along main thoroughfares while somewhat shielding lower density less traveled neighborhoods… Read more »

Byers, Erickson and Hang are a cancer to WeHo
Byers, Erickson and Hang are a cancer to WeHo
25 days ago

The key line is Chelsea Byers saying “WeHo has to play ball” and allow Sacramento to steamroll the city and destroy neighborhoods, pretending her hands are tied, which is not true Other cities ae fighting back with Alternative Plans. Not West Hollywood, which is beholden to developers who are salivating at the opportunity of building luxury apartments with no parking, destroying affordable housing in the process. Byers, Erickson and Hang support this so developers fund their future political ambitions They are a cancer to West Hollywood. VOTE THEM OUT!

Steve Martin
Steve Martin
25 days ago

Don’t fall for Byers phony alligator tears: she has consistently supported every mandate from Sacramento regarding housing, no matter how absurd or disconnected from our local reality and no matter how such policies incentivize the demolition of rent controlled buildings.

Kimberleigh Zolciack
Kimberleigh Zolciack
21 days ago
Reply to  Steve Martin

Imagine thinking California has built too much housing. I want whatever you guys are smoking!!!